Papers on "Sexual Harassment in the Workplace" and similar term paper topics
Paper #075010 ::
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
Buy and instantly download this paper now
An assessment of the current laws regarding sexual harassment and how it differs from basic workplace bullying or harassment.
Written in 2006; 1,697 words; 15 sources; MLA;
$ 55.95
Paper Summary:
This paper assesses the current laws regarding sexual harassment in the workplace, focusing specifically on the Supreme Court case Mack v. Otis Elevator in determining current legal standards regarding sexual harassment. This paper also examines the concepts and laws that are being implemented by employers in the corporate world today.
From the Paper:
"In Faragher, the City claimed that it was not responsible for the plaintiff's sexual harassment because it was "unaware" that it existed in the workplace; however, the Court ruled that this was not an acceptable rationale (118 S. Ct. 438). Instead, the Court established that higher-ups in the workplace ought to monitor and control the work environment, and that "reasonable care" ought to be exercised with regard to eliminating a hostile work environment (ibid.). However, these two cases also established that a "tangible employment action" had to occur as a result of the harassment, a decision which was later reiterated in Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders (No. 03-95, 2004). In Suders, the plaintiff asserted that the work environment was so hostile she eventually resigned as a result, and the Court utilized the upholding of her assertion to note that such a change of employment status was requisite for actionable suit aimed at an employer (Heller 2004).
This policy, however, is not to be understood as making an employer responsible for all conduct of employees under the aegis of the organization. Two early cases established that employers could not be held responsible for certain behaviors by employees; Corn v. Bausch and Lomb, Inc. established soon after the implementation of Title VII that the employer could not be held directly responsible for the personal actions of one employee (390 F. Supp 161). Likewise, Tompiks v. Public Service Electric and Gas Company noted that certain behaviors, specifically those that were "an unfortunate consequence of an inharmonious personal relationship," could not be construed as sexual harassment (422 F. Supp. 553)."
Tags:
sexual impropriety legal relationship executive employee Civil Rights Act
More papers on "Sexual Harassment in the Workplace"
-
Paper #029103 :: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (
1,132 words; 12 sources; APA )
-
Paper #103733 :: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (
1,624 words; 5 sources; MLA )
-
Paper #092392 :: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (
1,555 words; 10 sources; MLA )
-
Paper #047323 :: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (
2,148 words; 10 sources; MLA )
-
Paper #067359 :: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace (
759 words; 4 sources; APA )
About AcaDemon
We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper, you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.
 Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace
|
If you can't find your topic here, try another search
or try our affordable, unique custom paper alternative
Custom Research Services include:
- Papers written from scratch, according to your specifications.
Every paper is UNIQUE - Guaranteed
- Professional, top-notch writers
- All topics covered
- Any deadline
- Your satisfaction guaranteed
Place a Custom Research order now
Find out more about Custom Research
|
|
|
