| Papers [1-16] of 35 :: [Page 1 of 3] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 —> | Search results on "WAR 1812": |
|
|
The War of 1812, 2005.
This paper provides an analysis of the war of 1812 and discusses that no resolution was produced in this conflict between Great Britain and the United States.
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 8 sources, AU$ 184.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This thirteen page paper examines why historians are in general agreement that no one won the War of 1812. The writer concludes that the second conflict in thirty years between Great Britain and the United States produced no practical resolution of any of the issues that led to the war. Further, the writer discusses that this prevailing view is based upon the inability of both sides to win a decisive land or naval battle, and reflects the reality that the political and geographical status quo after the war in 1815 was much the same as it had been before the war broke out in 1812.
From the Paper
"Historians are in general agreement that no one won the War of 1812, for the second conflict in thirty years between Great Britain and the United States produced no practical resolution of any of the issues that led to the war. This prevailing view is based upon the inability of both sides to win a decisive land or naval battle, and reflects the reality that the political and geographical status quo after the war in 1815 was much the same as it had been before the war broke out in 1812."
| |
|
The War of 1812, 2007.
A discussion of the causes and outcomes of the War of 1812.
1,872 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 94.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores the root causes of the War of 1812, which involved Great Britain's war with Napoleon in Europe, as well as the young United State's commercial interests. The paper discusses how the war appears to have ended in a stalemate as there were no official territorial changes. The author is of the opinion, however, that the war was a success for America, as their independence was ultimately entrenched and any previous encroachments on American independence came to an end after the War of 1812.
From the Paper
"Peace after the Revolutionary War of Independence did not resolve all tension between the United States and Great Britain. This became evident on June 6, 1812 as the United States declared war on Great Britain. There are numerous reasons that led to the war, which primarily involve in some form Great Britain's involvement in war with Napoleon in Europe to the young United State's expansionist ambitions. This war that would become known as the War of 1812 was fought in North America from 1812 - 1815."
| |
|
The War of 1812, 2004.
An analysis of the War of 1812, following the British occupation of the United States.
813 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the War of 1812 and determines the major weaknesses in the United States' national structure. The paper presents an overview of these weaknesses, such as a weak military force, division of the country concerning the war effort and strong competition between political parties. The paper explores how these weaknesses were later addressed by the Republican Nationalists.
From the Paper
"The British occupation led to the War of 1812, however the country was divided on whether to fight the war or not. "The declaration of war had been made with military preparations still far from complete. There were fewer than 7,000 regular soldiers, distributed in widely scattered posts along the coast, near the Canadian border and in the remote interior. These soldiers were to be supported by the undisciplined militia of the states (www.usemb.se/usis/history/chapter4.html)." The lack of militia skill was evident when an invasion of Canada failed, resulting in Detroit being taken by the British. The failures of the militia were soon replaced with victories by U.S. Navy, restoring the confidence of the troops, and eventually resulting in Detroit being recaptured by the United States."
| |
|
The War of 1812, 2007.
This paper discusses the War of 1812, sometimes referred to as the Second War of Independence.
870 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes how this war marked the beginning of a new era of American nationalism. The paper looks at the causes of the War of 1812 and shows how some causes can be traced directly to unresolved issues between the United States and Great Britain. The paper notes two of the most significant outcomes of this war.
From the Paper
"According to the War Hawks, the British had been inciting the Indians to rebel against the United States. Many Native Americans had sided with and fought for the British during the Revolutionary War. Moreover, the possibility of a Native American tribal coalition loomed, threatening American territorial expansion. The War Hawks believed that the British supported the creation of an independent Native American state located in the Great Lakes region to serve as a buffer between the United States and Canada. Chief Tecumeh championed tribal unification and his efforts might have succeeded had the War Hawks not been as vocal in Congress. To the War Hawks, British support of the Native Americans was a declaration of war."
| |
|
War of 1812, 2004.
Describes the events leading up to the war of 1812.
1,342 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, APA, AU$ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Details the British initial wrongs with the United States, beginning with their backing of Native Americans in the 1790s. Describes British impressment on American ships and the role the war between France and England played in the treaties on trade, further antagonizing American interests. Explains the legislation imposed by Jefferson to combat the heightening of anger during these times and the events that directly started the war.
From the Paper
"The ?second war for independence?, the ?forgotten war? both have been used to describe the War of 1812, a war with many motives and an unclear purpose or solution decided by the War. The main reasons behind the development of the War of 1812 between Britain and the United States are the American lust for Canada, Britain?s backing of Indian revolts in the Mississippi Valley, Britain?s impressments of sailors in the ocean, invasion of United States commerce, and lack of respect for America led to the War of 1812. According to Bradford Perkins, Although the United States gained formal recognition of its freedom in 1783, for many years after that date the new nation remained a very minor factor in international politics, and the major powers of Europe felt free to treat the Americans as though that independence were not complete."
| |
|
The War Of 1812, 1973.
This paper discusses theories of various historians concerning America's declaration of war in 1812 on Great Britain: Harry Coles, W.H. Goodman, Braford Perkins and Julius Pratt.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 88.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The quarrel which climaxed in an American declaration of war on Great Britain in June, 1812, revolves around one central factor in world affairs, according to historian Bradford Perkins: "America chose to remain neutral while Britain struggled for her life against Napoleon.". In this struggle, Britain forcibly enlisted seamen from captured American merchant ships. England also instituted the unprecedented executive Orders in Council. These were meant to deprive Napoleon of essential goods and to reopen trade with the Continent. American seamen lost their liberty, the merchant his ships and the farmer a market for his crops.
Impressment was the most aggravating and persistent American complaint. This much appears clear. But there are many reasons cited for America's declaration of war. Here are some of them, ... "
| |
|
The War Of 1812, 1975.
This paper discusses the War Of 1812: Regional demarcations, the Embargo Act, the Enforcement Act and the Non-Intercourse Act.
3,825 words (approx. 15.3 pages), 14 sources, AU$ 215.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The War of 1812 found the United States in a powerful crunch between the international political and military struggle between England and France. The opportunities for expansion of trade and shipping while Europe was busy with internal war was a pleasant vista for the American masters of maritime commerce. The belligerents at first welcomed neutral trade and shipping but finally could not tolerate neutral commerce which no longer remained neutral when it increased the power of the enemy. By 1805, England was master of the seas. Napoleon dominated the continent. As early as 1805 - The Essex Case - the "broken voyage" concept was held by England to have become a pretext for ... "
|
| Essay # 6960 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
The American Revolution War and the War of 1812, 2008.
A look at the role of the British marines during the American Revolution and the War of 1812.
3,167 words (approx. 12.7 pages), 7 sources, APA, AU$ 145.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper states that in order to give a complete account of the events of the War of 1812, and the role played by the naval forces, the paper highlights the major battles the two main combatants were engaged in, and their outcomes for each side, with special focus on the role of the British marines. The paper states that the War of 1812 was essential in the economy of the relationship between the US and Britain. The paper analyzes the major battles and their implications, as well as the practical outcome this confrontation represented for the English. The paper also offers a a wide view on the overall process of independence for the US. The paper concludes with a discussion of the role of the British naval forces during this time.
From the Paper
"Any independence war, as the American Revolution came to be known in history, is a rather complex affair, engaging all the forces at the disposal of the parts. The Americans, eager to break apart from the British rule and establish themselves as an independent, free, and national state, made use of all the means at their disposal in order to defeat their ruler. On the other hand, the British had both a territory to control and a prestige to defend. The US colonies were a true asset for the Empire, taking into account the enormous economic perspectives lying ahead for the young states. On the other hand, the British were, at the time, the most important colonial power in the world, a reputation that had to be kept and protected from any attempt of undermining. All these aspects however cannot be pointed out without a proper presentation of the historical background that led to the burst of the American Revolution and the subsequent military developments, including the 1812 war."
| |
|
The War Hawks and the War of 1812, 2002.
Discusses the idea that the War Hawks of America were the cause of of the 1812 war against Spain.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 13 sources, AU$ 127.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Historically, the war of 1812 has been attributed to Royal Navy outrages against American commerce and the impressment of sailors on American vessels in the years before 1812. However, a more plausible explanation focuses on the War Hawks and their combined desire to ensure egress for American products, eliminate perceived British support for the western natives and provide an excuse to move against Spain in Florida.
| |
|
The Almost Defeat of 1812, 2007.
A book review of "Amateurs to Arms" by John Etling that discusses the War of 1812.
1,082 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In "Amateurs to Arms," John Etling makes it apparent that the United States went full forward into the War of 1812 both ignorant of its own shortcomings and poorly organized. Etllng explains both sides' positioning during important battles and sea conflicts, often highlighting the American downfalls that nearly lost them the war in the first years. The paper is of the opinion that Etling has clearly illustrated the timeline of events that led up to America barely saving itself from a foolhardy military endeavor. The paper concludes that the clear lesson to be learned from Etling's description of the War of 1812 is to be prepared.
From the Paper
"Etling spends much of Amateurs, to Arms! reviewing the battles and sea conflicts of the War of 1812. Etling focuses on facts and military detail, including troop numbers and insight into the decisions (for better or for worse) of the leadership involved. With the use of effective maps and illustrations, he also describes in detail the positioning of forces so that the reader can picture the events clearly. Even with the detail, Etling does not draw out battles or situations that play only small roles. For example, an encounter between Muir and Miller is given only a paragraph of explanation, enough to establish the chain of events that lead to the later actions of both parties (32-33). Establishing the mindsets of key individuals works hand in hand with Etling's clear yet not overly wordy descriptions while explaining where things went wrong for the American forces early in the war."
| |
|
U.S. Policy Towards Canada, 2002.
An overview of the political relationship between the U.S. and Canada during the 18th and 19th centuries with an emphasis on the War of 1812 and the Reciprocity Treaties of the 19th century.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 10 sources, AU$ 184.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will reveal and analyze the US polices towards Canada during the 18th and 19th centuries. By virtue of their importance and prominence in the history of US-Canada relations, the primary focus will be on the War of 1812 and the Reciprocity Treaties of the 19th century. History has shown that the preservation of a unique Canadian identity has been an eminent concern for Canada since the turn of the 19th century.
| |
|
U.S.-Canada Relations, 2002.
A look at the history of U.S.-Canada relations and the effects of American policies on early Canadian economic development focusing on the War of 1812 and the Reciprocity Treaty of 1854.
3,900 words (approx. 15.6 pages), 14 sources, AU$ 226.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will look at the dynamics and influence of American policies and objectives on Canadian economic development. By virtue of their importance and prominence in the history of US-Canada relations, the primary focus will be on the War of 1812 and the Reciprocity Treaty of 1854. While it might be argued that the 1854 Treaty just falls shy of 'early' economic history in Canada, the importance of the Treaty marks a milestone in north-south relations that is so important that it warrants the flexible use of the word 'early'. In any case, the motivations for the Treaty were manifest before 1854 and though it was not an inevitable outcome, it is in no way accurate to include the 1854 Treaty in a paper on early economic history.
| |
|
Sir Isaac Brock and the Tragedy at Queenston Heights, 2006.
A look at the relationship between Sir Isaac Brock and Governor General Prevost at the outbreak of the War of 1812.
2,967 words (approx. 11.9 pages), 10 sources, MLA, AU$ 139.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The War of 1812 was a watershed in the development of Canada as a nation. This paper examines the dual nature of command in Upper Canada at the turn of the 19th century and how the roles held by Sir Isaac Brock and Prevost shaped and influenced the war's outcome.
From the Paper
"On June 12, 1812, the zeal of the War Hawks in the American House of Representatives won the day, and an Act declaring war between the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was passed. It was at the helm of a favorably divided nation that President James Madison made an impassioned speech imploring Congress to take up the rifle against the evil Empire. J.C.A. Stagg, a member of the Department of History at the University of Auckland, writes in the "William and Mary Quarterly" "the existence of the War Hawks is essential to most explanations of the coming of the War." "
| |
|
Capitalism and the Civil War, 2006.
A discussion on capitalism as the main cause of the American Civil War.
1,730 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 88.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how of the many proposed causes of the Civil War, capitalism was by far the most important and discusses how it led directly to the conflict between north and south. It looks at how the birth of capitalism in the north was caused by the advent of the industrial revolution in the new country after the war of 1812 and how this in turn, created a situation in which workers of the north were paid for their efforts and workers in the south, the slaves, were not. It shows how this situation was economically unstable and how eventually, capitalism brought down the institution of slavery in the south.
From the Paper
"Prior to 1830, the United States had been able to manage the issue of slavery through a combination of compromise and avoidance. This issue had been a contentious one from the early days of the republic, almost threatening to derail the Constitutional Convention. The issue was tabled by providing a twenty-year period in which Congress could not ban slavery. The Missouri Compromise in 1820 again allowed the nation to manage the issue without confronting it. New states coming into the Union were admitted two at a time - one Slave and one Free."
| |
|
Poems of Robert Browning (1812-1889), 2005.
This paper discusses Robert Browning's poems "My Last Duchess" and "The Bishop Ordering His Tomb at Saint Praxed's Church".
1,390 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 0 sources, AU$ 74.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Robert Browning's poems "My Last Duchess" and "The Bishop Ordering His Tomb at Saint Praxed's Church", both dramatic monologues that take in the 16th century, portray a large discrepancy between the outer images and the inner character. The author points out that Browning, who was interested in how people lived during the Renaissance, supposedly a period of great artistic and spiritual enlightenment saw that people in the 16th century were just as greedy, egotistical and materialistic as people in the 19th century. The paper reveals that, the dark truth behind both the paintings is, that regardless of their station in life or how good, kind or saintly they portray themselves, a beautiful object may conceal an ugly truth.
Long quotes.
From the Paper
"In the first poem, My Last Duchess it is believed that Robert Browning based the Duke on a real person who was accused of killing his wife. According to critical experts, My Last Duchess" is Browning's extraordinary portrait of a Renaissance murderer who would have been astonished had anyone called his conduct criminal. In actuality, the person speaking in this poem is the Duke of Ferrara (b. 1533), who, following the death of his first wife, is now seeking the hand of the niece of the Count of Tyrol. The Duke asks his visitor to stop and look at this perfect picture of his Last Duchess, but although the picture is perfect, the Duke really believes that his Last Duchess was a less than perfect wife."
|
|
|
