| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "VIETNAM WAR": |
|
|
The Vietnam War, 2002.
This paper offers a comparative analysis of the views of the Vietnam War in the movie "Full Metal Jacket" by Stanley Kubrick and Ed Kugler's book "Dead Center: A Marine Sniper's Two-Year Odyssey in the Vietnam War".
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 1 source, AU$ 143.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the movie "Full Metal Jacket" and compares it to the book by Ed Kugler entitled: "Dead Center: A Marine Sniper's Two-Year Odyssey in the Vietnam War". The writer reveals the differences in the opinions of the war that have been made. The writer shows that the authors all have differing takes on what really happened in Vietnam, but that parallels can be drawn as well to cover the full scope of the war with a balanced perspective. By analyzing the two elements of media, the writer shows how entertainment value and literature can have two angles on an event that will always be remembered for its complex nature.
| |
|
The Vietnam War, 2007.
This paper examines the effects of the Vietnam war on American society.
1,991 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores the Vietnam War from the vantage point provided by a website named "Vietnam War". The paper focuses on the way that the Vietnam War impacted and affected culture and societal perceptions in the United States. The paper highlights the intense debate, confusion and discord that were taking place in American society at the time. The paper demonstrates how major events like the Vietnam War have a far-reaching and profound impact on society and its future.
Outline:
Introduction
Choice of Website
The Vietnam War
American Society and the Vietnam War
From the Paper
"The fact that 58, 000 American soldiers were killed during the Vietnam War was one central aspect of the war's impact on society. This fact was to lead to the criticisms of the war from within the country. Coupled with this was the public knowledge that between one and two million Vietnamese were killed during the war."
"The Web site concisely and comprehensively describes the complex historical causes of the war from a political point of view. "The Vietnam War was in many ways a direct successor to the French Indochina War, sometimes referred to as the First Indochina War, in which the French fought to maintain control of their colony in Indochina against an independence movement led by Communist Party leader Ho Chi Minh. " (Vietnam War)"
|
| Essay # 1720 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
The Vietnam War, 2007.
This paper discusses the Vietnam war and the failure of the Americans.
1,253 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains how the era of McCarthyism in America ushered in a period of policies aimed at combating communism. This and the policy of containment which aimed to limit the expansion of communism explains the involvement of the United States in Korea and Vietnam. The paper relates that the Vietnam War resulted in the Vietcong winning over the Americans. The paper discusses how Ho Chi Minh's leadership, dedication and sacrifice were the primary reason for Vietnam's success in the war against an opponent with superior training and equipment. The paper explains that Americans' commitment and dedication to a war that was not actually theirs, underestimation of their opponents and scrutiny at home and abroad were the causes for America's loss in the Vietnam War.
From the Paper
"Not only did the NVA and Vietcong employ military tactics but they also closely studied their American enemies. As daily casualties took its toll on America's forces and reports of atrocities and drug abuse filled the American media, the NVA and Vietcong capitalized on this by giving the media access to villages decimated by American troops and airmen in their countless "search and destroy" operations and bombing runs (America and the World, pp 187). As protests mounted around the United States, the NVA leadership sent letter hailing these peace advocates as heroes and followers of peace and justice, further fueling more and more anti war rallies."
| |
|
The Vietnam War, 2008.
An analysis of the Vietnam War as a war against communism and its outcome.
825 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the Vietnam war as a war by the United States, against communism. It looks briefly at the background to the Vietnam War and the reasons for America's involvement in the region. It then discusses the failure of the United States to conduct a war based on ideology and the effect this had on the outcome of the war. The paper concludes that the Vietnam War aided the Communist revolution and was detrimental to the United States foreign policy against Communism.
From the Paper
"The Vietnam War is known as one of the biggest mistakes in United States foreign policy. In an effort to control the spread of Communism, the United States entered the war simply based on principle. The lack of dedication, other than military resources, points to wrongful intentions, inaccurate allocation of resources, and ultimately the disappointment of the South Vietnamese citizens. Even though more than half a million United States troops were deployed in the Vietnam War, it is apparent that the lack of cohesive military strategy and the ability to adjust to environmental factors led to the downfall of the campaign. In essence, the Vietnam War aided the Communist revolution, and was detrimental to the United States foreign policy against Communism."
| |
|
"The Vietnam Wars: 1945-1990", 2004.
An overview of Marilyn Young's book on the Vietnam War and how it relates to America's current foreign policy strategy.
1,244 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 0 sources, AU$ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In 1991, Marilyn Young authored "The Vietnam Wars: 1945-1990". Although the book is considered a general history book on the theme of Vietnam War, it has a major slant and is not an unbiased, objective approach to the war by any means. This paper shows that, in short, the book debunks the belief by those in power at the time, such as George Bush, Sr., that America has ?finally kicked the 'Vietnam syndrome" or that the United States does all that it can not to get militarily involved with other political entities abroad. The paper explains that, by showing both the American and the Indochina sides of this military event, Young expresses that the war in Vietnam and other such activities contested the black-and-white conjectures that, in foreign policy, America always "meant well" and that Communism was always "bad."
From the Paper
"She concludes that perhaps it is time to redefine the Vietnam syndrome. The term should no longer refer to the reluctance of the public to engage in war, but rather to the insistence of the present administration that the only cure for that long ago defeat is more war. As President Bush said in a December 2002 U.S. News & World Report interview: " ... it's very important for the American people to know my sentiments about military engagement, that I will use our military as a last resort and our first resort.... ""
| |
|
The U.S. Economy and the Vietnam War, 2002.
Review of three books on the state of the U.S. economy, before, during, and after the Vietnam War.
965 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews different literature discussing the economic implications of the Vietnam War on the U.S. Economy. The books analyzed are "Lyndon Johnson and The Wars for Vietnam", "Nixon's Economy: Booms, Busts, Dollars, and Votes", and "The Economic Consequences of the Vietnam War". The paper concludes with the finding that the U.S. economy was significantly damaged by American involvement in the war and that American presidents of that period were aware of the damage being done to the economy but pursued war nonetheless.
From the Paper
"Perhaps the most eloquent work in this regard is that of Anthony Campagna (1991) with his book titled "The Economic Consequences of the Vietnam War." Campagna in this book traces the historical performance of the US economy along with the country's involvement in the unwanted War. According to him the US involvement began during the Truman administration when the US promised to help the French government in their governance of the Indochina region. The US after the World War II followed a containment of Communism foreign policy and to help the French meant containment of the Asian and China region effectively."
| |
|
The Vietnam War, 2005.
This paper is a detailed narrative history of the Vietnam War.
4,390 words (approx. 17.6 pages), 21 sources, MLA, AU$ 185.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the roots of the Vietnam War (1961-1975) really began with the fall of the French Colonial Empire at Dien Bien Phu, when the Americans became involved in the greatest war debacle in U.S. history. The author points out that this secret war was being conducted mainly by the Central Intelligence Agency and its founding Director Allen Dulles, the Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and President Dwight David Eisenhower. The paper explains that this war started when Ho Chi Min, the Communist strong man in Hanoi and founder of Viet-Cong, and Ngo Dinh Diem, president of South Vietnam, who had the full backing of the United States' assets, got involved in a gorilla war, which escalated into the Vietnam War from which Ho brought the United States to their knees in disgrace.
From the Paper
"With the abrupt fall of the Japanese Empire in August of 1945, Ho Chi Minh seizes his opportunity. Using the established Viet Minh, formally known as Vietnam Doc Lap Dong Minh or The League for the Independence of Vietnam, Ho established at the 8th Plenum at Pac Bo, in May of 1941, as his tool. In September 1945, Ho Chi Minh declares Vietnam's independence in Hanoi. Surprisingly there is little to no opposition to his declaration and he feels confident his organizational structures and skills are sound. So confident, in fact, Ho goes to Paris in 1946 to negotiate the separation from France personally with his staff of advisors."
| |
|
The Tragedy of the Vietnam War, 2004.
A look at how the tragedy of the Vietnam War has been portrayed though writing, photography, and motion pictures.
1,559 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the Vietnam War was devastating to many people for many reasons and how many individuals have expressed the torment that the victims of the Vietnam War experienced through writing, photography, and motion pictures. It examines some of these works, such as Tim O'Brien's "The Things They Carried", and the movie, "Dear America: Letters Home From Vietnam", and shows how these personal experiences help us relate to the weight of the war, as well as understand the scope of the war?s reach.
From the Paper
"The image ?What They Carried? also makes a powerful statement about the war. The first thing we notice is that the soldier is missing one leg and it appears that both of his arms have been broken. The image is black and white, which adds to the dramatic mood of the image. The man looks confused and tired as he stands in a metropolis (New York perhaps) under a cloudy sky. What is striking about the image is that it focuses on one soldier out of hundreds of thousands who fought in Vietnam. We can see how the soldier feels isolated and abandoned by his country. We cannot help but think of each individual life that was effected by the war and how displaced those who returned must have felt--especially those who were wounded."
| |
|
The Vietnam War and its Impact on American Culture, 2001.
In the following paper the writer examines some of the cultural involvement present during the Vietnam War.
2,660 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 127.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay discusses the Vietnam War not just as a war fought in Asia, but as a war fought in American as it related to cultural change. It was, in many ways, a cultural war that was coming for several years and only needed some powerful fuel to ignite radical changes. The essay concludes with the realization that the psychological impact left on the families and soldiers involved in Vietnam, was greater than anyone imagined.
From the paper:
?The country was living in the lap of luxury, or more specifically in the lap of capitalism. America was proud, yet was also beginning to feel pressure concerning truly solid realities such as the inequality of the African American and women. The Vietnam War served to ignite many fires, changing the American culture in many ways.?
| |
|
The Vietnam War, 2006.
A brief look at the causes of the Vietnam War.
1,116 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, APA, AU$ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper traces the history of Vietnam from the end of the Second World War. It contends that the Vietnam War was not the result of a deliberate policy decision by militant party strategists in North Vietnam but was the consequence of Prime Minister Ngo Dinh Diem's own repressive measures in the south, measures which forced desperate peasants and Vietminh supporters to take up arms and defend themselves.
From the Paper
"In January 1951, 15,000 Vietminh troops attacked French posts at Vinh Yen, but the French were able to put up a strong front and defend the town only thirty miles northwest of Hanoi with the use of U.S. imported napalm bombs. Another setback for Ho Chi Minh was "the growing desire for statehood among educated groups in Laos and Cambodia." The Vietminh would not be discouraged. Recognizing that occupation of the French and the threat it posed to their supply route in Hoa Binh, they launched a "bitter battle" and lost approximately fifty-five percent of their 40,000 troops. This battle was successful with the French withdrawing. Ho Chi Minh resisted negotiations and was quoted as saying that "peace could only come about through victory.""
| |
|
Secret Economics: The Economic Impact of the Vietnam War, 2002.
This paper is an analysis of the economic impact that the Vietnam War had on the American economy.
2,440 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 8 sources, APA, AU$ 119.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to estimate what the real total economic cost of the Vietnam War was to the United States. The paper concludes that a reasonable estimate of the economic impact of the Vietnam War on the American economy is that an entire year's worth of productive activity was used to fight the war.
From the Paper
"The Vietnam War was the defining experience for a generation of Americans. Indeed, it is arguably one of the defining experiences of America as a whole in the Twentieth Century. Its impact on the men who fought there, the men (and women) who did not, the American military in general, American society and popular culture during and following the war has been well documented. However, it was not just a life changing experience for soldiers and protestors, or a force for social change, or even an inspiration for thousands of books and dozens of movies. War is not least an economic event. In addition to being a military defeat, a political blunder and a human tragedy, the Vietnam War was also an economic disaster."
| |
|
Conscientious Objection to the Vietnam War, 2002.
A look at the social effects of the Vietnam War on US society.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 9 sources, AU$ 143.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper presents arguments against Vietnam War and the possible affects it had on the family dynamics, social standing and personal relationships of those who adhered to the decision not to partake in the war that only resulted in bloodshed, restrained relationships and loss of uncountable innocent lives. Moreover, the paper highlights the sufferings of those COs (Conscientious Objectors) whose fathers served in the military while Vietnam War gave birth to sorrow, poverty and hatred among the masses.
| |
|
The Vietnam War, 2008.
An analysis of the foreign, military and economic factors that made the Vietnam War a necessity for American policy-makers and working class people.
1,255 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at why the Vietnam War was necessary - at least to many American policy-makers and to many ordinary Americans in the 1960s. Specifically, it outlines the general sentiments which made many draft-eligible baby-boomers suspicious of the war and how their suspicions were not shared by literally millions of other working-class Americans. Finally, the paper discusses the foreign policy and the military and economic considerations that also made the decision to go into Vietnam so imperative - and kept the war a major priority for US policy-makers even when things began to go sour in the final years of the conflict.
From the Paper
"To close, this paper has looked at the factors which made the war in Vietnam so vital to so many. Not least of all, many Americans in that epoch took pride in the United States' pre-eminent role in beating back the forces of Communism, and many others believed that US institutions would come under increasing fire from outside the nation's borders if the spread of Communism was not stemmed in Southeast Asia. In the end, while it is easy to ridicule some of those decisions now, placing those determinations within the context of their times reveals that US fears were perfectly understandable."
|
| Essay # 57859 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Nixon and the Vietnam War, 2007.
This paper evaluates the leadership of President Richard Nixon during the Vietnam War.
1,185 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that President Richard Nixon's strategy for the Vietnam War was "peace with honor". The author relates that Nixon's 1969 policy of the "Vietnamization" of the war meant the handing over of the responsibility of fighting to the South Vietnamese in order to protect their own country. The paper points out that this "Vietnamization" policy was a success domestically in the U.S. but was certainly a failure for South Vietnam. The author concludes that, although Nixon's strategies were thoughtful and not without solid footing, the time was too late to mend things in Vietnam; however, he did manage to reduce greatly the number of American casualties and the U.S. involvement in Vietnam.
From the Paper
"Nixon also attempted more diplomatic ways to achieve peace with honor. One was that of meeting with the Great Powers: China and the Soviet Union. In 1971, Nixon met with China's Mao and Russia's Brezhnev and held talks. Behind the facade of Nixon's diplomacy was the underbelly of attempting to disillusion the Vietnamese by meeting peacefully with their supporter nations. This policy was somewhat successful in that Vietnam questioned the true stance of their communist allies, but it ended up coming to no avail."
|
|
|
