| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "LEGALIZING GAY MARRIAGE": |
|
|
The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States, 2006.
A discussion regarding the controversial issue of same sex marriage in the USA.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the long debated issue of gay marriage in the United States. This paper reports how proponents of the issue contend that same sex marriage is not about gay rights but about human rights. It further discusses how these individuals believe that gays in modern society have long been subjected to inequalities and a lack of support from the social order. The opponents of the gay marriage issue refer to a stereotypical framework for gays in general that suggests that gays are evil and dangerous to children.
| |
|
Legalizing Gay Marriage, 2006.
A paper examining the issue of gay marriages and whether they should be legalized because not doing so would deny homosexuals their basic civil rights.
3,184 words (approx. 12.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, AU$ 133.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a study for understanding whether there is a need to legalize gay marriages. The paper is divided into three sections arguing three thesis statements. The first thesis statement argues that marriage is a civil right of every individual, as it is essential for the emotional well-being of individuals and denying it to the gay community is discriminatory. Hence, the study begins with a discussion of the argument that denying the civil rights of marriage is discriminatory. The second thesis statement asserts that gays are denied the rights which are associated with marriage and that denying these rights is a violation of their civil rights and therefore a need exists to legalize gay marriages. By way of this thesis statement, the paper offers an understanding as to the rights which are associated with marriage but which are denied to gay couples and discusses whether there is a need to legalize gay marriages taking this perspective into consideration. The third thesis statement argues that legalizing gay marriage is necessary for the security and well-being of the children that gay couples are caring for. Herein, the paper attempts to analyze whether children of gay couples would entail the security required if gay marriages are legalized. Thus, on the basis of the above three thesis statements, the paper tries to formulate an understanding of whether denying marriage to homosexual couples leads to denial of civil rights to the gay community and whether there is a need to legalize gay marriages.
Table of Contents
Introduction
First Thesis Statement
Second Thesis Statement
Third Thesis Statement
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Whether the US community is prepared to permit people to marry without the consideration of gender is gaining our notice daily. Religion and civil marriage are two clearly different entities. Certainly this is completely fitting. Certainly, the state must not have the right to order for whom religious organization might carry out marriage services --- akin to the fact that religions institutions must not set terms regarding who might get a license for civil marriage from the state. Latest census data show that the number of faithful same-sex couples in the US has been mounting, as also the number of same-sex couple's upbringing children. Accordingly recognition in the eyes of law is crucial to safeguarding the emotional and financial health of these families. Besides, legal approval should be on a same footing with that of heterosexual marriage ---'separate but equal' is by no means equal."
| |
|
Legalizing Gay Marriage, 2004.
A brief analysis of the controversial issue of legalizing gay marriages.
791 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of legalizing same-sex marriages. The paper presents the views of both proponents and opponents of gay marriage, claiming that, while both parties approach the issue in America through the legalization process, the issue touches upon personal and religious convictions as well. The paper contends that like the issue of marriage between different races, it may be that concerns for civil liberties and the children produced by such unions will win out over societal definitions of what morally and historically constitutes the uniquely heterosexual nature of marriage.
From the Paper
"When recently, on February 7, 2005, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg stated that although he supported gay marriage on personal, ethical grounds, but worried that a recent ruling by a New York judge allowing same sex unions might get the city into legal troubles, he was roundly denounced as expressing a lack of political backbone. (Ruttenberg, 2005) Several gay elected officials at City Hall blasted the mayor for what State Senator Thomas K. Duane called cowardice, after the mayor stated that he intended to appeal the decision allowing gay marriages in the city, so that the metropolis could have greater legal clarification in the issue."
| |
|
Legalize Gay Marriage, 2006.
This article studies the question of marriage between gays or lesbians.
1,340 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer maintains that gays and lesbians are not allowed to get married because of their gender preferences. Some of the fierce advocates of the concept of marriage do not believe that gays and lesbians should be allowed to get married or adopt children. The writer looks at the aspect of children being brought up by a gay couple and studies the question of such a marriage. This paper looks at the argument of legalizing gay marriages and discusses the hypocrisy and prejudices involved in this matter.
From the Paper
"Gay people are not allowed to be married because the community feels that they cannot bring up children they way that non-gay parents could. We are all aware of the day to day sorrows and joys, pains and achievement that we all face as human beings, as friends and as parents. To judge the capability of a parent by the structure of their family is not only wrong it goes beyond and above all the researched that have been done on successful parenthood. It does not matter what the structure of the family is as long as it is built with emotions of devotion, obligation, selflessness, and love in the family. Not a single research or study has proven that a gay or lesbian couple cannot provide the same kind of harmony and love in the structure as a non-gay couple (David, 2003)."
| |
|
Gay Marriage should not be Legalized, 2006.
A debate on whether or not gay marriages should become legalized.
1,721 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper deals with one of the most controversial issues in America today: whether or not gay marriage should be legalized. The author puts forward the three main arguments against gay marriage: 1) it can put children at risk; 2) it can cause undue expenses for employers and the U.S. government; 3) it has the potential to undermine the traditional institution of marriage between one man and one woman. The author of the paper, states however, that gay marriage should be thoroughly examined from every angle of inquiry in order to promote and encourage the democratic principles upon which America was founded.
From the Paper
"One of the most basic arguments against gay marriage is related to the role of children in such unions. Legalizing gay marriage, as Peter Sprigg points out, "would of course logically lead to granting homosexual unions adoptive and parenting rights and the implications of this are dire indeed" (156). Conversely, some studies have suggested that there appears to be no solid difference between children raised in a stable homosexual home and those raised in a traditional heterosexual home, yet in truth, there are a number of problems with the potential to severely affect the children brought up in such environments.
"First of all, the development of sexual identity could be impaired among children of lesbian or gay parents. Some studies suggest that "children brought up by gay fathers or lesbian mothers show disturbances in gender identity or in gender role behavior" and that some children "will themselves become gay as a result of living in a gay environment" (Kotulski, 167). In this case, children would become confused as to their individual gender differences and might not see nor understand the differences between men and women. Also, if a child sees nothing wrong with being gay, he/she might attempt to emulate the parent's lifestyle and thus lead the life of a homosexual/lesbian."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2005.
A discussion on the legalization of gay marriage.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 114.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the issue of same-sex marriage and proposes that it should be legalized. It examines the objections to legalizing gay marriage and contests these arguments. It gives the many reasons same-sex marriages should be legalized and itemises some of the benefits gays miss out on by not being allowed to marry.
From the Paper
"The question of same-sex marriage is one that has been very much in the forefront of public discussion in recent years with states granting then withdrawing marriage licenses to gay couples, haggling over legislation as to whether to grant full marriage .."
| |
|
Supporting Gay Marriage, 2007.
This paper presents an argument in support of gay marriage.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that in today's modern world, the issue of gay marriage has spawned a huge debate centering on whether or not gay couples should be legally allowed to become married. Those who oppose gay marriage contend that such an arrangement if made legal would destroy American society by changing the traditional family unit of a mother, father and children; others point out that gay marriage is not supported by the Christian religion. The writer discusses that in contrast, those who support gay marriage contend that such an arrangement between either two men or two women is factually not that different from traditional marriages and that all of the arguments against gay marriage are based on misinformation, rumor and outright lies by numerous national organizations seeking to make certain that gay marriage is never made legal nor recognized as a legitimate way of living. The writer concludes that it is quite clear that if gay marriage was legalized in the United States, our current social systems would not collapse nor become non-existent.
From the Paper
"Not surprisingly, gay couples in today's America see this opposition to gay marriage as nothing less than an issue of civil rights. As outlined in the Bill of Rights, every American citizen is entitled to the same civil and legal protections regardless of race, national origin, religious beliefs and sexual gender. Thus, it is abundantly clear that gay marriage should be legal in the United States in the face of so much opposition which is mostly based on religious beliefs and unfounded cultural fears and phobias. For example, if the science of genetics does eventually determine beyond a shadow of a doubt that being gay is inborn, i.e. genetically predetermined, then what the Holy Bible says about homosexuality is hypocritical."
"In conclusion, it is quite clear that if gay marriage was legalized in the United States, our current social systems would not collapse nor become non-existent."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2007.
An argumentative essay on the legality of gay marriages, based on Aristotelian thought.
1,347 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay examines the issue of gay marriages from the three basic forms of reasoning established by Aristotle--ethos (emotional rationales), pathos (rationales based on moral authority), and logos (based on logical reasoning). The writer argues that all aspects of Aristotelian thought can be seen as rationally favoring the establishment of gay marriage as a civil right. The paper concludes that arguments in each of the three primary areas of Aristotle's rational thinking--emotional, moral authority, and logical--demonstrate the benefits to be gained and the moral coherence of such unions.
From the Paper
"The first of these is perhaps the most controversial, most frequently used, and yet least reasoned: an emotional appeal regarding the requisites for marriage in our society as "one man, one woman" or some similar catchphrase. The opposing arguments in this category center on the "sanctity of marriage" as a tradition that is ordained by a higher power (that is to say, higher than the government) as a sacred union between a man and a woman. Emotional appeals to preserve the traditional status of such unions revolve around this argument that the way things have "always" been; i.e., marriage between a man and a woman, ought to continue to be the way things are."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2006.
An argument in favor of legalizing gay marriage in the U.S.
2,200 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that marriage for same-gendered couples should be legalized because: (1) It is necessary for the protection of both the individuals involved and their children, (2) it is natural and with some historical precedence and (3) there are no logical reasons to disallow it. The paper begins by discussing the legal, social and economic rights that are conferred to a married couple, extrapolating that by prohibiting same-sex unions, states are inherently discriminating against gay couples. Next the paper provides examples of historical precedent for the legalization or sanctification of same-sex marriages, dating back to the first century. The paper concludes by refuting some of the current arguments against same-sex marriage, suggesting that most opponents are merely rabid homophobes.
From the Paper
"Marriage determines who is allowed hospital visitation and who may make medical decisions for an individual and their children. A partners or non-biological adult child of a homosexual individual would not be allowed to visit them in the hospital or make decisions which would then be left up to biological family members -- who, in many cases, are no longer on good terms due to their relatives orientation. Children may not be able to recieve visitation or medical input from both caretakers, as well. Health insurance and family leave are also potent issues -- partners and their children are generally not covered in employee benefits, which means that the children in a gay union may not have medical insurance in only one parent works and the other stays home. Additionally, as couples age they will find that most nursing homes do not allow same-gendered couples to stay together, though married couples are allowed this privilege."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2004.
An argumentative essay on why gay marriage should be legal.
1,629 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of whether or not gay marriages should be legalized. The paper presents a short story of a gay couple in order to illustrate the argument. The paper examines a wide range of opinions both in favor of and against homosexual marriages. The paper contends, that after taking everything into consideration, gay marriage should indeed be legalized in the United States as well as the whole world over.
From the Paper
"John Dylan and Paul Reagan have been living together for 3 years. John went to Parsons School of Design and is now a fashion designer for Polo Ralph Lauren. On the other hand, Paul is a sales representative at a Louis Vuitton store. John and Paul went to the same high school in a preppy suburb in Virginia where they met and decided to go out together. Since then, they became soul mates and their lives are bonded. It's sweet how they are still together. This seems sounds like a perfect story, but there's something wrong in this relationship. They want to demonstrate their love and get married, but they don't have the right to do so because they are gay. Gay marriage should be legal."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2006.
This paper looks at the tradition of marriage and examines the argument regarding gay marriage.
975 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 3 sources, APA, AU$ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this article claims that as one of the thorniest issues on the American political scorecard since the abortion debate, homosexual marriage is drawing the attention of philosophers, journalists, legal analysts and psychologists. The writer argues in favor of gay marriage and discusses the legal and behavioral rights position in this regard. The writer contends that gay marriage is not the contentious issue that it seems when placed in the perspective of civil rights, and maintains that any attempt to argue against gay marriage is inherently biased.
From the Paper
"Renowned psychologist Erik Erikson describes the human life cycle in terms of stages of psycho-social development. His theories can lend insight into the debate over gay marriage and can show why homosexual romance and marriage are no different from heterosexual romance and marriage. The stage at which most human beings get married is the stage that Erikson calls early and young adulthood. Indeed, in most human cultures, marriages occur during this chronological life stage. The quest for intimacy has been crystallized in fairy tales, in which the princess (it's usually a princess) finally discovers her prince charming. The two live happily ever after. However, no known fairy tale describes a homosexual union. The absence of homosexual unions in fairy tales and in other forms of cultural discourse should in no case be a reason to exclude gays from the marriage institution. Contrary to what Schulman has to say, traditions are not always valid or valuable."
| |
|
Gay and Lesbian Marriage, 2005.
An examination of whether gay and lesbian marriages should be accepted in all realms of society.
1,212 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Gay and lesbian marriage has become a controversial debate in contemporary society. There are heated arguments for and against the legalization of marriage between couples of the same sex. This paper explains that the underlying assumption for those in favor of gay marriages is that the central aspects of love, relationship, and understanding should override all other issues. However, this paper argues that the situation is not quite that simple. There are numerous factors that militate against the acceptance of gay marriage as an institution in modern society. The paper points out that gay marriages have the potential to create serious problems with regard to a range of very important social and cultural issues that make marriages of this nature untenable in modern society.
From the Paper
"The argument that I wish to propose is not based on any of these perceptions or views. The central argument against the institution of gay and lesbian marriage has nothing to do with assumptions and judgments about homosexuality, and neither do I wish to deprive people of their intrinsic and inalienable democratic rights. Rather the objection to same-sex marriage is simply based on the fact that it contributes to the downfall of society; more particularly the institution of the family - the foundation of society - and subsequently will impact negatively on the development of children within the society. Therefore, the argument against gay marriage that I propose is based purely on practical and societal considerations."
| |
|
Liberals, Conservatives and Gay Marriage, 2006.
This paper examines the ideologies of liberalism and conservatism in the United States through the issue of gay marriage.
1,787 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers an objective examination of the issue of gay marriage through the lens of conservative and liberal political ideologies. The author states his intent as exploring the difference in these political ideologies as seen through gay marriage. A definition and brief history of each outlook is given followed by their perspectives on gay marriage and how it fits each ideology.
From the Paper
"As the word implies, conservatism seeks to conserve something, in most cases the traditional values that have previously been discussed, or some sort of social institution from the past. Conservatives also seek to conserve the established social order. That is why conservatives also strongly support such things as the right to own firearms of all types, the death penalty, industry over environmental protection, and a minimally invasive government. These are all things that have traditionally been a part of our nation's heritage. Conservatives feel that if it is traditional and has worked in the past, has held our country together even, then it should be kept as a national institution. Abortion is another good example of an issue that is dear to conservatives. Allowing abortion in this country, when it had traditionally been illegal, was a liberal movement, and one that conservatives feel should be repealed so we can go back to our traditional values of not terminating pregnancies."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2004.
This paper discusses the issue of gay marriage in the United States.
1,130 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer lookks at the matter of gay marriage in the United States. The writer discusses prejudices within the American society in this regard. Further, the writer discusses the importance of gay marriages to equality for homosexuals. The writer also looks at the view of the Pope and the Catholic Church on gay marriages.
From the Paper
"Andrew Sullivan states that homosexual marriage can be discussed on many levels including social, societal, political and religious perspectives. One of his most important points is that any rational person considering this issue would have to concede that without the right to same sex marriage there cannot be social economic or political equality for homosexuals in America. He suggests that fear of homosexuals and homosexuality is one of the last prejudices that American society has not yet faced. He suggests that for any prejudice to be defeated ... "
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2005.
Position paper arguing in favor of gay marriages.
1,303 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper maintains that arguments presented in opposition of gay marriages are flawed and invalid. The author explains that religious arguments opposed to gay marriages are invalid because they violate the principle of separation of church and state and that the right to a gay marriage should be guaranteed because it is an issue of civil rights.
From the Paper
"One of the central arguments against gay marriage is that it will have a negative affect on the institution of the family and adversely impact on the upbringing of children. Yet, there has been no proof of these claims and research has indicated that no significant difference has been identified between children brought up in family headed by a gay couple and a heterosexual family. Despite this there are still many people who have strong reservations about gay marriage and gay couples who rear children. The first question that arises in the research about gay marriage is why such avid opposition to the idea of gay marriage continues to exist, even for those who do not oppose basic rights for gay people."
| |
|
Gay Marriage, 2005.
This paper discusses gay marriage, which is a polarizing issue because it involves arguments based on religion and politics.
1,505 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 5 sources, APA, AU$ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that the debate over whether the state ought to recognize gay marriages has focused on the issue as one of civil rights, but such treatment is erroneous because state recognition of marriage is not a universal right. The author points out that, during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the institution of marriage saw a series of overwhelming changes in societal structure and gender roles, which have forever changed the way matrimony is perceived in the society. The paper concludes that gays should not have the same civil marriage as straight people and should be limited in terms of their freedoms from pursing the sanctification of marriage through religious and governmental institutions.
Table of Contents
Arguments For and Against
Civil Unions and Marriages
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Some say that civil rights are enjoyed by individuals and are in the Constitution, while civil liberties are in the Bill of Rights. Two examples of civil liberties would be, first of all, someone who wanted to practice their own religion, such as if the individual was Amish, without interference from the government, and secondly, if an individual wanted to exercise their freedom of speech. Civil rights are more about equity principles, such as women having the equal right to vote just like men, and generally the issue of gays and lesbians being able to get married is considered by many on both sides of the argument to be a civil rights issue."
|
|
|
