| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "LEGAL": |
|
|
Legal Naturalism vs. Legal Positivism, 2002.
A comparison of laws understood to come about naturally or through some form of positive creation.
2,630 words (approx. 10.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 114.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines two of the general theories of law - legal naturalism and legal positivism, both of which have had an enormous influence on law throughout history. The first part of the paper looks at natural law which describes those diverse theories of law that do not accept human law as true law and hold that a particular "something other than the positive law is the true law". The second section examines legal positivism where one of several general theoretical traditions is based on the belief that the source of knowledge lies in experience, not in reason, nor in mind.
From the Paper
"A good example of the usefulness of classical legal naturalism can be seen in the rise of commercial law in the Middle Ages in Europe. As Glendon, Gordon, and Carozza point out, the rise of commercial law took place when Roman civil law provided no adequate coverage of new problems that arose as trade "emerged from the localism and relative economic stagnation of the Middle Ages" in the form of international banking, expanded maritime trade, and rising commercial centers."
| |
|
The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States The Legalization of Gay Marriage in the United States, 2006.
A discussion regarding the controversial issue of same sex marriage in the USA.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 0 sources, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the long debated issue of gay marriage in the United States. This paper reports how proponents of the issue contend that same sex marriage is not about gay rights but about human rights. It further discusses how these individuals believe that gays in modern society have long been subjected to inequalities and a lack of support from the social order. The opponents of the gay marriage issue refer to a stereotypical framework for gays in general that suggests that gays are evil and dangerous to children.
| |
|
The Legalization of Marijuana, 2008.
An in-depth analysis of the issue of legalizing marijuana and a conclusion against its legalization.
5,139 words (approx. 20.6 pages), 13 sources, MLA, AU$ 185.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores the arguments for and against the legalization of marijuana and takes the position that, while there are some rational points of view in favor of legalizing marijuana, the legalization of yet another drug is not justified. The paper argues that the legalization of any drug promotes a culture of acceptance and dependence which can lead to further acceptance and dependence on other types of drugs. The paper includes color graphs and appends a graph of Marijuana seizures and a color map of countries and their marijuana laws.
Outline:
Introduction
Overview
The Debate: Pros and Cons
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"The debate about the legalization and the pros and cons of the drug marijuana has been one that has constantly been fought in the public as well in the medical arenas. The issue of the possible legalization of this substance has also been linked to facets such as crime, social stability and norms and the affect on the family structure. There are numerous arguments both for and against the legalization of marijuana. Proponents of legalization claim that marijuana is in fact relatively innocuous compared to other substances and drugs which are already legal. This refers to various accepted drugs and of course to the fact that tobacco and cigarettes are legally obtainable. Many people state that in comparison to many other legal drugs, marijuana is in fact less harmful in many respects and should be legalized. Among the many arguments put forward in favor of Marijuana is the assertion that it provides medicinal value which makes it more acceptable."
| |
|
Legalization of Marijuana, 2007.
This paper looks at the argument over the legalization of marijuana, with an emphasis in support of legalization and decriminalization.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Following the introduction in the paper, which explains why prohibition of marijuana in the US has been a failure, the writer presents a brief description of the history of marijuana and looks at its use in different cultures. The writer explains why marijuana is harmless and argues that marijuana should be legalized or at least decriminalized. After mentioning a few of many convincing reasons to legalize marijuana, the writer explains why one should and how one could move beyond the failure of prohibition. In addition, the writer suggests ways to take action in the fight to legalize marijuana.
From the Paper
"The first recorded incident of the discovery of marijuana was made by Herodotus, a Greek historian, who recorded its psychedelic effects during his travels through northern Europe in 430 BC. A study of scriptural texts even shows that Jesus was almost certainly a cannabis user and an early proponent of the medicinal properties of the drug. In AD 1563, Queen Elizabeth I ordered landowners with 60 acres or more to grow cannabis or face a fine, and cannabis was not outlawed in Britain until 1928. Marijuana was first outlawed in the US in 1937, at which time over 3,000 doctors were prosecuted for illegally prescribing cannabis-derived medicines. Rallies and protests for the legalization of marijuana have continued to exist ever since it was prohibited in every country that outlawed it."
"Despite marijuana's legal status, it is still openly used in many countries, and it is used differently among many different cultures. Most people are aware of marijuana's legality in Amsterdam, which has made that country famous and recognized for one thing only."
| |
|
Legalization of Marijuana, 2002.
A look at the pros and cons of the legalization of marijuana in the United States.
914 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the topic of legalizing marijuana. Specifically, it discusses the current United States' policies, the uses of marijuana, and the arguments for and against legalizing marijuana. Includes an outline.
Legalization of Marijuana
I. Current U.S. Policy regarding legalization of Marijuana
a. State law overview
b. Penalties
c. Pending legislation
II. Uses
a. Medical
b. Recreational
c. Environmental
III. Arguments
a. Pro legalization
b. Against legalization
c. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
From the Paper
"The legalization of marijuana is one of the most controversial and volatile topics facing Americans today. In 2001, 34 percent of adult Americans believed marijuana should be legalized, the largest percentage since 1969, and up to 70 percent of adults approve of the use of medicinal marijuana (Cauchon, 2001, 01A). However, in November 2002, voters in Nevada turned down a measure to make the drug more readily available in the Silver State. Opposition is strongest among conservative Americans, while younger adults favor decriminalization. "The USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll found that support for legalization is highest among 18- to 49-year-olds, people in the West and independent voters. Opposition was greatest among the elderly, regular churchgoers and Republicans" (Cauchon, 2001, p. 01A)."
| |
|
Legalization of Prostitution, 2002.
A case for legalizing prostitution on the grounds that women generally receive a greater level of respect and acceptance for their profession in countries where prostitution is legal.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 8 sources, AU$ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay makes a case for legalizing prostitution. It argues that women generally receive a greater level of respect and acceptance for their profession in countries where prostitution is legal. They also receive more protection from routine police abuse, and get better medical care. However, the very nature of the profession means that the legalization of prostitution still comes with some stigmas and problems continue to proliferate even where it is legal. This essay still makes a claim for the legalization of prostitution, which, in spite of the problems that continue to be associated with it, tends to offer a safer service both for the individuals in the profession, and for their clientele. .
| |
|
The Legalization of Marijuana, 2002.
Discusses the arguments for and against the legalization of marijuana and industrial hemp.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 12 sources, AU$ 154.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Debate continues on the subject of whether marijuana and industrial hemp ought to be legalized in the United States. This paper results from an exploration of approaches to the question which has reached the point in public debate where factions tend to be divided into those in favour of legalization and those absolutely opposed to marijuana's legalization. At the present time, the arguments in favour of legalization do appear more reasoned and in accordance with several now longstanding arguments which have been put forward pertaining to both the effects of legalization and the overall safety of marijuana as a drug for public consumption.
| |
|
The Legalization of Drugs.
This paper argues against the legalization of drugs, which has been an ongoing debate since the 1970s.
3,340 words (approx. 13.4 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 138.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discuss marijuana, crack/cocaine, tranquilizers, hallucinogens, amphetamines, heroin, alcohol, nicotine. and caffeine to provide a framework for the author's argument that the legalization of drugs can in no way be deemed ethical or moral. The author points out that caffeine is an amphetamine, but it doesn't stand out because it is legal; although the effects of overuse don't seem to be as serious as those of other "harder" drugs, caffeine can be a dangerous drug. The paper concludes that the only argument that can be used to justify the legalization of drugs is ethical formalism; therefore, with only one available argumentative system to justify drug legalization as a moral act, the author believes that the conclusion to reject the legalization is correct.
From the Paper
"What is a drug? A drug, as defined by "Webster's Dictionary" is: (1) a substance used as a medication or in the preparation of a medication, (2) a substance intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, (3) a substance other than food intended to affect the structure or function of the body, (4) a substance that causes addiction or habituation. The fact that the definition of drugs has so many components may be the cause of why society cannot come up with an agreement about whether or not drugs should be legalized. The definition contains the medical use of drugs which in the majority of cases are pharmacological drugs that have been recognized by doctors and pharmacists and it also contains the negative side of drugs which is the fact that drugs can cause addiction or habituation and can affect the body and mind. All drugs affect the body and mind. This includes prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, illegal drugs, and the drugs that we sometimes fail to recognize as drugs because they are so common."
| |
|
The Legalization of Prostitution, 2006.
An examination of the legalization of prostitution as a positive step towards protecting the safety and dignity of sex-trade workers.
1,629 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the positive effects that legalization of prostitution would have not only on the people involved in this industry, but on society as a whole. The writer discusses a recent study that focuses chiefly upon the impact of legalized brothels in Nevada. The writer further explains how, based on this study, legalization will reduce the spread of sexually-transmitted disease, cut down on violence against sex-trade workers, and discourage the upsetting of public order. The writer concludes that while there is an understandable public aversion to legalizing prostitution, the benefits to women engaged in this industry makes legalization something law-makers should seriously consider.
From the Paper
"One of the first things which becomes apparent with regards to the legalization of prostitution is that several of the rationales which have historically been brought forward in defense of keeping it illegal - reducing the threat of sexually-transmitted diseases, discouraging "violence" against community order, and thwarting inter-personal violence against women who happen to be sex-trade workers - are actually better-served by legalization. For example, a recent study - focusing chiefly upon the impact of legalized brothels in Nevada - reveals that a compelling case can be put forward that legalization of prostitution brings with it a level of public scrutiny and observation, a measure of official regulation, and sufficient "bureaucratization" that the forms of violence detailed above are actually reduced (Brents, 270 and 280-295)."
| |
|
Legalization of Drugs, 2005.
This paper explores the issue of drug abuse and considers decriminalization or legalization.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, AU$ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses that drug abuse is a real problem in the United States. The paper questions if the present way of handling the drug problem is the best way to cut down on drug abuse. The paper asks if decriminalization is better than legalization. The paper then questions if drugs should be legalized and if so, which drugs should be legalized. The paper considers that legalizing different drugs would put the responsibility on the user and thus change the problems associated with drugs, including criminalization.
From the Paper
"According to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse released in 2002, "an estimated 15.9 million Americans aged 12 and older were current users of illicit drugs in 2001, meaning that they used an illicit drugs" (Crime 408). Drug abuse is a real problem in the United States, but is the current manner of handling the drug problem the best way to cut down on drug abuse? Analyzing "Crime in the Modern World" will show how legalizing different drugs such as marijuana can be beneficial as well as reduce cost to enforcing laws and sending offenders to prison. An important difference should be noted, however, between decriminalizing drugs and legalizing them: "[Decriminalization] reduces criminal penalties associated with the personal possession of a controlled substance, legalization eliminates the laws and associated criminal penalties that prohibit its production, sale, distribution and possession" (Crime 428)."
| |
|
The Economics of the Legalization of Drugs, 2001.
A look at the global economic impact of the legalization of drugs at the microeconomic level of the consumers, distributors and producers of drugs.
1,950 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 90.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes a survey that appeared in "The Economist," which examined the economic and social impact of the legalization of drugs around the world. It focuses on the microeconomic effects legalization would have and analyzes data presented in the survey using tools and methods that are taught at intermediate level economics classes. This paper examines the effects of legalization on price, demand, consumption and distribution.
From the Paper
"Regardless of the moral or political positions one takes on the use or trade of illicit substances, one has to appreciate the complexity and the organization of the world drug trade. The drug trade is a truly global industry, as the production and distribution of illegal substances requires participation from, and relatively unmatched cooperation between, different groups from nearly every corner of the world. As impressive as the geographic scope of the drug trade is the economic prowess of the industry, which generates annual sales of somewhere between $150 and $400 billion, based on different estimates. The industry's illegitimate status also makes it one of the most dangerous in the world for those who participate at all levels, from producers to distributors, and even to consumers. The drug trade also causes enormous problems, both financially and socially, to nearly every nation involved - and not just from the questionable nature of the drugs themselves, but also because of the tactics employed by the world's most powerful governments, especially by the United States, to eliminate, curb, or otherwise control the flow of illegal substances. In the survey in The Economist, powerful arguments are presented that try to establish that the policies and enforcement strategies of the world's powers against the drug trade cause far greater harm than the industry does itself. Further, the survey argues a great deal of the problems caused by the drug industry to nations and peoples around the world are more a result of these policies and tactics than anything inherent in the industry or the substances themselves. The survey presents a number of arguments from both a social standpoint and an economic perspective as to how the United States and the rest of the world might benefit from the legalization of illicit substances. In this paper the focus will be on the economic evidence presented in the survey and its correlation with the theory of the firm and the consumer in microeconomics."
| |
|
Drug Legalization and Decriminalization, 2002.
A look at the issues concerning drug legalization and decriminalization of drug policy in America.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 154.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the nature of the legalization of drugs, and the possibilities of decriminalization that have been brought before our nations courts. By understanding what the arguments are for both sides, we can argue for a more balanced approach to the issue of legalization and what this means. In essence, we can rely on creating an argument for drugs to be a good medical source that could be legally created, and also would help to lower levels of criminals that are imprisoned for this offense. By realizing the sides of the argument, we can see how drugs can be brought into the system on a legal basis that would be responsibly used.
| |
|
Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage, 2002.
This is a persuasive paper supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage in the U.S.
2,450 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 8 sources, APA, AU$ 107.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the proposal for legalization of same-sex marriage, and how it is one of the most significant issues in contemporary American family law. The author discusses the potential consequences of legalizing same-sex marriage, both positive and negative, for children, parents, same-sex couples, families, and the social structure. Litigation and current laws regarding this issue are discussed. Arguments are made for the legalization of same-sex marriage.
From the Paper
"Marriage has changed greatly throughout the years. In Western law, wives are now equal rather than subordinate partners; interracial marriage is now widely accepted, both in statute and in society; and marital failure itself, rather than the fault of one partner, may be grounds for a divorce. Social change has been felt in marriages in recent years as divorce rates have increased and have been integrated into upper class families. Proposals to legalize same-sex marriage or to enact broad domestic partnership laws are currently being promoted by gay and lesbian activists, especially in Europe and North America."
| |
|
Drug Legalization, 2005.
This paper explores the issue of drug legalization in the United States.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 1 source, AU$ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper is a review of the two arguments presented in the book "Legalize It? Debating American Drug Policy" by Trebach and Inciardi, two well-known writers on the controversial topic of the legalization of drugs in the US. The paper summarizes and reviews the effectiveness of each of their main arguments and presents a possible solution to the drug legalization question.
From the Paper
"In their book "Legalize It? Debating American Drug Policy," authors Trebach and Inciardi debate the issues surrounding legalization of drugs in the US. Both advocate changes to current policies, laws and attitudes about illegal drug abuse and addiction, but present fundamentally opposite opinions on the issue of legalization for what are currently classified as illegal drugs. By examining both of their perspectives and arguments, this paper will provide a suggestion as to the best-case scenario for resolving their divergent solutions and perhaps find a way to bring them together."
| |
|
Legalization Of Marijuana, 1989.
Covers pros & cons, legality, effects, research and commissions. Conclusion is pro-legalization.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 80.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Between 1973 and 1978, 11 states have decriminalized the recreational use of small amounts of marijuana, thereby removing all criminal penalties. Since 1978, however, the movement toward decriminalizing (or even legalizing) marijuana has come to a standstill. No additional states have joined in decriminalizing the drug and public attitudes have shifted against recreational marijuana use. This marijuana backlash is hardly surprising in the conservative climate prevailing in the recent decade. What is more surprising, given this conservative hegemony, is how limited the backlash has been.
The purpose of this research is to examine the merits of maintaining legal sanctions against the recreational use of small amounts of marijuana. The nature of Cannabis will be discussed along with its potential health effects. Finally, the social (...)"
| |
|
The Legalization of Marijuana, 2005.
This paper argues for the legalization of marijuana for adults.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains the machinations of authority and how moral social typology creates problems for legalization of marijuana. The author points out that, by effectively denouncing a helpful and clinically proven drug that could help millions of sick patients, the American government continues to enact Prohibition-styled laws to prevent legalization. The paper relates that, in this manner, economic and other forces seem to create great value for the drug and police control by creating harsh penalties for those that deal it or are caught using it.
From the Paper
"The topic of marijuana usage for adults has been a challenging form of deviancy that has been introduced into American society since it was banned in the middle of the twentieth century. The problem of legality for the use of marijuana seems constructed around the negative cultural and authoritative constructs that help to shape the way marijuana is used within a sociological perspective. In this manner, the American government imposes deviant values and social norms, which are enforced by imprisonment and relate a demonization of a drug that violates personal freedoms. Furthermore, the medical usage of marijuana has been proven to be effective as a painkiller, but there is a great refusal of the government to recognize the positive attributes of the drug."
|
|
|
