| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "HYPERTEXT MANIFESTO": |
|
|
Hypertext Manifesto, 2006.
An examination of the move to hypertext in the literary world.
3,702 words (approx. 14.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 149.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper the author looks at the old ways of presenting literary works and how these have now been overtaken with newer methods which some consider to be lacking culture and class. The author mentions how visual texts, in other words the computer, has overtaken the traditional books which are considered hard copies where pages can be turned and viewed again and again. The paper looks at the emergence of the World Wide Web from its inception and how it has developed. In conclusion, the author reminds us that there is nothing as popular as a book and that the hypertext of the computer needs to be joined with the traditional books in order for the two to work together.
Table of Contents:
Critics
The Neo-Luddite Response
Social Implications
Advances
Founders
Bush and Nelson
Footnotes
Works Cited
From the Paper
"Inevitably, there are the unabashed defenders of the old ways, and they are abundantly catalogued and portrayed in the media. Only too recently, I counted myself as among those who stridently defended their campaign to expose the regrettable state of literature today. Guided by a sense of mission and fueled by genuine moral outrage, these rescuers of the word and crusaders for the Canon quickly established themselves as the penultimate conduit for all of the cultural anxiety of our time. They have a misplaced and sometimes overwrought self-righteousness about their decrees, which-no surprise-makes great copy for reporters and culture critics alike. In their zeal to skewer the opposition and every perceived bogeymen in sight, they leave a bad smell behind, like a dog having done its business. Expecting to be embraced and coddled by their fawning compatriots, and awaiting obligatory sympathy from a silent public as well, they launch their missives from near and afar, bedecked in the battle-ready fatigues of the moment."
| |
|
Hypertext, 63.
A comparison and review of hypertext literature.
3,190 words (approx. 12.8 pages), 5 sources, APA, AU$ 134.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares various works of hypertext literature: ?Radiant Textuality? by Jerome McGann, ?The Gutenberg? by Steven Birkerts, ?From Text to Hypertext ?By Silvio Gaggi, ?Hypertext? by George P. Landow, ?Hypertext? by Geoffrey Nunberg, ?Tolstoy Dictaphone? by Steven Birkerts. It describes the viewer's input when reading hypertext fiction and literature on the Internet, where a lot of their thoughts, views and opinions become involved in the story. The paper is critical of hypertext fiction and literature on the Web and describes its dreadful inscriptions, boring text and the unattractive style of writings and impassive categorization - not to mention its obvious grammatical errors and mismanagement of HTML technology..
Table of Contents
Radiant Textuality by Jerome McGann
The Gutenberg by Steven Birkerts
From Text to Hypertext By Silvio Gaggi
Hyper text by George P. Landow
Hypertext by Geoffrey Nunberg
Tolstoy Dictaphone By Steven Birkerts
Affects of Hypertext on Fiction And Literature
From the Paper
"The writer, Jerome McGann in his book ?Radiant Textuality? has attempted to illustrate that Digital media has the capability to do much more than categorize and classify the approach to the great and brilliant works and efforts of literals and artists. The writer asserts that the digital media has the capability to be a grave, fundamental and significant instrument of unparalleled supremacy, and this power is much further than its presently recognized perspective and documentation skill."
| |
|
Marx's Communist Manifesto, 2007.
This paper presents an examination of the Communist Manifesto and the relation of gender and family to politics and class.
1,769 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the the relationship between gender and family to politics and class and how they impact the Manifesto. The paper explains that the Manifesto was authored over 150 years ago and was a blueprint plan for communism. The paper shows how relations between class and politics and gender and family are clear through the teachings Karl Marx imparts in the Manifesto. The paper discusses how Marx and Friedrich Engels accuse the bourgeoisie class of not respecting family values or females. The paper explains that the family of the bourgeoisie class will self destruct; true strong family values and respect of females as a gender will eventually rise up and overpower the bourgeois class to provide a world of equality, family love and peace.
Outline:
Introduction
Class and Politics
Family
Conclusion
From the Paper
"According to the Manifesto the development of the new social classes occurred in direct correlation with the corresponding changes and advances in the political system that went along with that class. The Manifesto claims that the oppressed class has historically played a very important revolutionary part in the development of the class system, the political advances and the development and advancement of communism itself during the process. The emerging class of the bourgeoisie played a part in the development of the other class as well because without the separation of its parts it would not have created an atmosphere for another class to emerge."
| |
|
The Dada Manifesto, 2002.
An overview of the main points of the Dada manifesto written by Tzara Tristan in 1918.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, AU$ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a discussion on the Dada manifesto by Tzara Tristan in 1918. The author of this paper discusses the general purpose of the Dada manifesto as well as analyzes what various parts of it may mean to the readers. It also summarizes the possible thoughts and meaning of the author of the manifesto as well.
| |
|
The Communist Manifesto, 2006.
A review of "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, AU$ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the ideas in "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, in which they set forth a program that is both descriptive and prescriptive, describing what they see as the evolution of society and prescribing action in order to take society to the next level. According to the paper, they say that this level is inevitable, but that does not mean it cannot be hurried along by action. The Manifesto involves both social and economic change on a grand scale, including a shift in the political structures from one era to the next.
From the Paper
"The state in which these men lived at the time was capitalism, which they saw as only an interim state before the uprising of the proletariat and the imposition of a dictatorship of the proletariat before a shift to a completely communist system, presumably the end point in the evolution of the social order. "
| |
|
Religion in "Uncle Tom's Cabin" and the "Communist Manifesto", 2001.
This paper discusses the way in which religion was used to help maintain power with reference to two works: "Uncle Tom's Cabin" and the "Communist Manifesto".
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 3 sources, AU$ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper looks at two works: "Uncle Tom's Cabin" and the "Communist Manifesto". The way in which religion was used to help maintain power will be discussed with reference to these two works. The fundamental similarities and differences between these two books will be drawn upon.
From the paper:
" Although Uncle Tom?s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe and the Communist Manifesto were written at about the same point in history, they are markedly different books. Although one was a fictional novel and one a philosophical treatise, both works influenced their countries to a greater or lesser degree during a civil war, and surprisingly similar views regarding religion are either expressed or implied in both works. This paper will look at how the two works discuss or reveal how religion was used to help maintain positions of power."
| |
|
Agile Manifesto, 2006.
A review of the Agile Manifesto and of Martin Fowler's contribution to object-oriented technology.
776 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the Agile Manifesto, a conceptual framework for software development. The paper focuses primarily on Martin Fowler, one of the pioneers of the Agile Manifesto and one of the gurus of design patterns. The paper discusses how Fowler is able to emphasize the importance of this methodology in writing software.
From the Paper
"Although Fowler strives to achieve simplicity in his software design and development, other critics view the simplistic approach "as not realistic (Fowler, 2006)" and then on the other hand, a rebuttal can be made by stating, "but if you make it too complex then people have to understand a bunch of stuff that's nothing to do with the pattern in order to understand the pattern. (Fowler, 2006)" Still, Fowlers style promotes an easier understanding of any system and renders the output as usable, reusable and understandable not only to other developers by the lay users as well. Like a well written English literature, Fowler divides his pattern work into the Alexandrian form wherein (Fowler, 2006)"
| |
|
The Communist Manifesto: A Struggle with reality, 2007.
A criticism of Karl Marx's "Communist Manifesto".
1,493 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the weaknesses in Karl Marx' argumentation for the victory of the proletariat. More specifically, the paper focuses on Marx's beliefs about economics and the inevitable victory of the proletariat . The paper discusses these concepts and beliefs as found in Marx's work "Communist Manifesto" and then presents the writer's opinions of Marx's work.
From the Paper
""The communist Manifesto is, of course, a document written for a particular moment in history," Eric Hosbawn states in his introduction to the modern edition of Marx' Communist Manifesto. And yet its impact extends far past that particular moment in history, drawing in the suppressed as well as intellectuals, because it makes believe that history itself is working towards the realization of their ideals for humanity. The notion that the "fall of the bourgeoisie and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable" is an inspiring construct, however, one that has proven faulty and inaccurate in the contexts of history and human nature. Hosbawn further suggests that the Manifesto represented a relatively immature phase in the development of Marxian thought. This implies that at the particular time when it was written Marx himself did not yet have a full grasp of economic theory and people theory. In this paper, I intend to examine some of the weaknesses in Marx argumentation, more specifically in his beliefs about economics, and why the "victory of the proletariat" proved to be evitable after all."
| |
|
?The Communist Manifesto", 2002.
A review of "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
1,004 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A review of Karl Marx's "The Communist Manifesto". Written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in 1848. The writer claims that this book has grown into the most influential, most criticized and most well-known political pamphlet ever written. This paper explores how Marx and Engels describe the process by which humanity has become divided into two distinct and opposing social classes: The proletariat - the property-less working class and the bourgeoisie or the property-owning class.
From the Paper
?The Communist Manifesto? opens with the assertion that ?The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles?(p. 57). From this, the essence of the Manifesto is derived. Marx and Engels present humanity as divided most distinctly along lines of social class. As the world has traversed into modernity, the nature of this distinction has simplified."
| |
|
"The Communist Manifesto", 2004.
A brief review of "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
1,007 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a review of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels's vision as written in "The Communist Manifesto". In the book, the essential theory presented is the creation of only one class, so that there would no longer be a class struggle. The writer includes comments from Marx and Engels on whether the argument in the book is legitimate or flawed and uses other writers and philosophers who also comment on the book.
From the Paper
"In the novel, a doctor, through mathematical calculations, discovers that he has a soul, which is a completely unheard of notion in his society, where individuals are objectified and individuality is stifled. Reason is viewed as the citizens' primary handicap. The society in We is so objectified that even thought and love are explained by a mathematical equation. This novel Each novel foreshadow a future of a society which stifles individuality and warns of a future of science, technology and rationalism carried to an excessive degree and completely lacking in ethics. Zamyatin is openly criticizing many aspects of the communist society in which he lived."
| |
|
Karl Marx's "Manifesto", 2004.
Explains the theories and critique of capitalism presented in Karl Marx's "Manifesto of the Communist Party".
941 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains the key concepts of Marx's doctrine put forth in his "Manifesto of the Communist Party". The paper looks at his theories on labor, social classes, historical events, and class conflict.
From the Paper
"Many of Marx?s ideas can be seen in the U.S. today. A key concept in Marx's critique of capitalism is that labor has been reduced to the status of a commodity, meaning that its value is equivalent to its cost of reproduction. Marx's ideas on labor value are very much alive for many organizations working for social change. In addition, it is apparent that the gap between the rich and poor is widening on a consistent basis. In the United States today, according to a Federal Reserve Board report, one percent of the population has more wealth than the bottom 90 percent, and it is far, far more unequal than it was in Marx's day. In this light, many of the theory?s predictions ring true."
| |
|
The Communist Manifesto, 2005.
An analysis of the Karl Marx's "Communist Manifesto".
1,380 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 3 sources, APA, AU$ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a discussion of social inequality and class struggle, as they relate to the history of modern society laid out in Karl Marx's "Communist Manifesto". The paper examines Marx's vision of history as a class struggle.
From the Paper
"In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx lays out his vision of history. According to Marx, the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. The divisions and struggles between classes and the fundamental inequality that underpin..."
| |
|
The Communist Manifesto, 2004.
An analysis of the Communist Manifesto.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers a summary and analysis of the 1848 Communist Manifesto written by Marx and Engels. It discusses issues of class structure and the proletariat revolution. It also mentions the formation of the Communist League.
From the Paper
"In the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in Europe (OECD) detailed the growing gap between the incomes of the rich and poor in OECD member states. In particular the study concluded that the poorest percent of the population in the countries examined received only two percent of the national income while the richest percent of the population received ..."
| |
|
"The Communist Manifesto", 2002.
An analysis of the "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes "The Communist Manifesto", discusses the intention of Karl Marx when he wrote it, identifies the audience it was intended for, and examines the basic principles of the working classes in terms of what they needed to do to overthrow the bourgeoisie.
| |
|
Communist Manifesto, 2007.
This paper examines the beliefs of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels portrayed in 'The Manifesto of the Communist Party'.
1,160 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines 'The Manifesto of the Communist Party' by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels from the year 1848. The writer maintains that their suggestion that history, politics, and economy have always been entwined makes sense in light of the fact that the communist system they propose is both a political and economic system. The writer discusses the document and looks at its argument for change. The writer concludes that despite the fact that the document was written a long time ago, Marx and Engels still capture the spirit of the modern imagination by asserting the power people have for change and reminding even the humblest factory worker that life could and should be different.
From the Paper
"The Manifesto of the Communist Party by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels professed revolutionary ideas in 1848. The authors expressed their views of the history of economics, politics, and society and suggested remedies for the evils they discerned. Their ideas were new and radical in their scope, and the transitioning world of the 19th and 20th centuries was a receptive audience. The wide appeal of their words during the first two centuries of the existence of the Manifesto has declined, though, because of the rise of individualism and the concrete failures of the system of communism that have so pervaded the modern world."
| |
|
"The Communist Manifesto", 2002.
A brief summary of "The Communist Manifesto" by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
910 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a brief summary of this famous work written in 1848 by Marx and Engels. It explains how the authors describe the process by which humanity has become divided into two distinct and opposing social classes: the proletariat (the property-less working class) and the bourgeoisie(the property-owning class). It shows that Marx and Engels argue that the relationship between the classes has become agitated beyond repair, laying the foundation for an inevitable proletarian revolution.
From the Paper
"?The Communist Manifesto? opens with the assertion that ?The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles?(p. 57). From this, the essence of the Manifesto is derived. Marx and Engels present humanity as divided most distinctly along lines of social class. As the world has traversed into modernity, the nature of this distinction has simplified. By the mid-19th century, Marx and Engels believed that the breakdown of society between the oppressed and the oppressors was bi-polar, symbolized in the antagonistic existence of ?two great classes directly facing each other: bourgeoisie and proletariat?(p. 59). "
|
|
|
