| Papers [1-16] of 40 :: [Page 1 of 3] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 —> | Search results on "HELLENISTIC ERA": |
|
|
The Hellenistic Era, 2008.
An analysis of philosophical and religious syncretism in the Hellenistic Era.
1,334 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 3 sources, APA, AU$ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the syncretistic or homogeneous tenets of Hellenistic religion and philosophy. It looks at how the military expansionism of Alexander the Great's Macedonian armies helped to bring about a greater knowledge of differing belief systems, which allowed greater syncretism between philosophy and religion. It also discusses how, due to the elitist and often exclusionary principles of extremist religious (Pharisees) and philosophical tenets (Aristotle and Plato), the creation of Stoicism and Epicureanism helped unify the divide between these two factions.
From the Paper
"The greater part of the Hellenistic era is derivative from the invasions of Alexander the Great (356-323 BCE) form his native Macedonia. From about 336 BCE, Alexander the Great had conquered much of the Mediterranean and had a massive influence over the way that people thought about religion and about philosophy. Although Alexander was essentially a Macedonian he was far different from the mainland Greeks in his tolerance for other religious ideals. In many ways, he was able to integrate both aspects of religion and philosophy into a more unified system. "
| |
|
Hellenistic Art, 2002.
The emergence of Hellenistic art.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is on the "Emergence of Hellenistic art". It includes a brief detail of the Hellenistic period and the Hellenistic art.
| |
|
Hellenistic Art, 2002.
An insight into Hellenistic Art and its influences.
810 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Hellenistic Art was primarily influenced by Alexander the Great?s conquests, which introduced the culture, arts and philosophies of foreign lands into the Greek milieu and how it mirrored Alexander?s pride, his vision and his stature. It looks at how the term ?Hellenistic? describes the arts that fuse the Greek with Asian traditions and reflects a shift in Greek consciousness away from the pantheon of gods toward a private, wealthy sector of art collectors. It evaluates how while the Classical arts of Ancient Greece adorned temples, Hellenistic art decorated the palaces of kings and of the private houses of wealthy connoisseurs.
From the Paper
"New dynastic centers like those at Pergamum and Alexandria promoted large-scale palace architecture influenced by Oriental styles and scale. New royal patronage for the arts differed from that of Classical Greece city-state patronage. Instead of the anonymous, religious statues like that on the Athenian Parthenon, statues honored war victories, new syncretic deities, and portraiture of royal families. The faces and figures of gods and goddesses changed, influenced by the religious traditions of Egypt, the Far East and the Middle East. In short, Greece was less important to Greek art. The Classical period climaxed and left a legacy as grand of that of the Athenian Parthenon. Towns were already established, their architecture preserved."
| |
|
Women in Hellenistic Sculpture, 2005.
This paper discusses the representation of women in Hellenistic sculpture.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 10 sources, AU$ 130.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the Hellenistic period that covers some 300 years, from 323 B.C. to 31 B.C. The writer discusses the great political changes of the Hellenistic regime during this period. In this article, the writer studies the portrayal of women at this time in Hellenistic sculpture.
From the Paper
"The Hellenistic period covers some 300 years, from 323 B.C. to 31 B.C. The beginning of the era was marked by the death of Alexander the Great, and the end came with the Roman conquest of the Hellenistic regime. There were massive political changes during this time period, as the self-contained city-states suddenly gave way to the much more loosely organized domains of the Hellenistic kings. In addition, Greek cities were now founded far to the East of the previous boundaries of Hellenism."
| |
|
Hellenistic Society: A Foundation for the World, 2005.
This paper discusses the Hellenistic society and looks at how this society became a foundation for the world.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 3 sources, AU$ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This report focuses on the historical significance of the Hellenistic society, and its impact on the world. Matters discussed in this article are the concepts of the Hellenistic Kings; the social order prior to the rule of Alexander the Great; the successful conquests of Alexander; the reign of his successors; the differences in the social order of the polis and the emerging Hellenistic society. Further, the writer looks at the significant alterations made in politics, religion, art, architecture, and philosophy of the time.
From the Paper
"The Hellenistic Period, although a time of great unrest and turmoil in history, laid the framework for modern societies throughout the world. Overcoming struggles of power, kingdoms won and lost, shifts in governmental structure, and changes in social order, the people of the Hellenistic Period created an epic past that we can build upon in expanding the cultures of our contemporary planet. "Hellene", the word for the Greeks, is the core of the term "Hellenistic". The Hellenistic Period was considered the age of the Greeks, and it was a time in which the Greek culture impacted the world through politics, literature, art, philosophy, drama, and religion."
| |
|
Rome and Hellenistic Civilization, 2008.
This paper argues that Rome was the heir of Hellenistic civilization.
1,780 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper maintains that Roman civilization was a true heir to Hellenistic civilization since it was based on a Roman cultural base that grew and changed by adding elements from other conquered cultures. The paper explains that, although Roman civilization used many Greek elements, it combined them in a uniquely Roman way. The paper therefore shows how Roman culture was not just a pale imitation of the Greek culture.
From the Paper
"To begin this argument it is necessary to define a Hellenistic civilization. In The Western Humanities Roy T. Matthews and Dewitt Platt argue that Hellenistic relates to, "...the time period from about 323 to 31 B.C., when Greek and oriental or Middle Eastern cultures and institutions intermingled to create a heterogeneous and cosmopolitan civilization.""
"This definition would seem to indicate that Rome was not a
Hellenistic civilization because it does not fit the time frame. However, Rome was located in the right geographic area and due to its expansion and absorption of conquered peoples had a heterogeneous and cosmopolitan civilization. This would seem to indicate that Rome was an heir to Hellenistic civilization even though it does not fit into the definition of Matthews and Platt."
| |
|
Alexander the Great: Cultivator of the Hellenistic Civilization, 2002.
Examines this leader's dedication to the cultivation of Hellenistic culture.
819 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the history of human civilization, no one has attained greater popularity in the realm of conquest of great human civilizations in the world than Alexander the Great. This great leader, general and conqueror of early Western and Eastern civilizations in the world is renowned for his extraordinary ability to conquer and administer numerous cities and kingdoms. He is also regarded as the Great Emperor of human civilization during his time because of his ability to lead his military troops and maintain order and stability in his land despite various revolts and antagonism about his conquests, leadership abilities and decisions as a ruler. This paper presents a general biography of the life of Alexander the Great as the great leader of human civilization. However, the focus of this paper shows Alexander the Great not only as the conqueror of Western and Eastern kingdoms, but also as an individual dedicated to the cultivation of Hellenistic Civilization, which was the prevailing culture and society in his kingdoms during his time of reign.
From the Paper
"Aside from his title as King of Macedonia, he was also given the title of being the Emperor of Persia, and the son of Amon-Ra, the Sun god of the Egyptian mythology. Although he acquired numerous titles under these different cultures, Alexander the Great remained faithful to the cultivation of the Hellenistic Civilization that started during the reign of his father, King Phillip II. During his reign, Alexander the Great contributed significantly to the Hellenistic Civilization through the cultivation of Greek culture, society, and politics. In Greek politics, the conquests that Alexander conducted, his method of conquering kingdoms and vast lands, as well as his leadership skills, had been the model of what politics is like during the Hellenistic civilization. The conceptualization and emergence of the great and central city of Alexandria is a perfect example of the society and culture that Alexander the Great cultivated during his reign as Emperor of these conquered kingdoms."
| |
|
Hellenistic Judaism, 2004.
An examination of the impact that Greek rule had on Judaism by examining the writings of Aristobolus and Philo.
1,719 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the influence that Hellenistic rule had on Judaism of the time. It explains how the Jews compromised by altering enough to blend in, but did not completely lose their roots and heritage. It focuses on the writings of Aristobolus and Philo, two Hellenistic Jewish philosophers who provided a rich source of information for understanding Jewish life during this period.
From the Paper
"During the 5th century B.C., several lands including that of the Hebrew people came under Greek rule due to Alexander the Great's conquests. Previously, the Babylonians had conquered the Hebrews? kingdom, destroying the capital city, Jerusalem, along with their religious center, Solomon?s Temple. The Babylonians also exiled most of the Hebrew people from their homeland. However, when the Persians later conquered Babylon, the Hebrews were allowed to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their Temple. When the armies of Alexander the Great in turn defeated the Persians, the Hebrews were allowed to return, and Jerusalem and their homeland came under Greek rule. Hebrew literature written under Greek rule during this time period is therefore called Second-Temple literature, since the Babylonians destroyed the first Temple."
| |
|
Ptolemaic Egypt/Hellenistic European Period, 2002.
Discussion of the the rise and fall of Ptolemaic Egypt.
4,215 words (approx. 16.9 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 164.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a chronological look at the Hellenistic kingdom of Ptolemaic Egypt from its founding to its eventual end and integration into the Roman Empire under Caesar. It also looks at the succession of Ptolemaic rulers, the Ptolemy governments, and the infrastructure and economy established under these rulers. Included are descriptions of the significant aspects of the culture and religion of that era. The paper also covers the fall of the Ptolemaic empire and the events and characters in history that contributed to the fall.
From the Paper
"After entering Egypt with no resistance, Alexander the Great stayed in Egypt about six months. (Platt and Ashwani 1985) From there he marched east into Asia and onto the plains of Indus, (modern day India). Before departing for points east Alexander appointed a nobleman from Macedonia satrap, (governor), of Egypt. His name was Ptolemy. In 306 B.C. having been part of ongoing civil wars with the other generals from Alexander?s campaigns, Ptolemy declared himself king, and later god-king, of Egypt. Thus began the Hellenistic kingdom of Ptolemaic Egypt."
| |
|
Hellenistic Theater, 2003.
Examines characteristics and historical context.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 9 sources, AU$ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses both the physical plant and the plays, how the playwrights and poets of the time functioned in the theater, how the Hellenistic model influenced modern theater, and differences.
From the Paper
"This research examines the characteristics of Hellenistic theatre, including both the physical plant and the plays that appeared during the period. The research will examine the historical context in which Hellenistic theatre flourished and then discuss ..."
| |
|
Greek Culture, 2002.
Thispaper discusses Greek culture. The Hellenic era existed before Alexander the Great.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Hellenistic period started after Alexander, and it influences even our era. Slavery existed in both periods but there was more emphasis on religion in the Hellenic era. The Hellenic era witnessed democracy and the existence of city-states. The Hellenistic era was governed by monarchies. Materialism became widespread in this time that also marked the demise of truly creative philosophy.
| |
|
Philosophical Education, the Scholastic School, and Kant, 2005.
A comparison of the Hellenistic practice of philosophical education, the Scholastic School, and Kant's "The Conflict of the Faculties".
4,354 words (approx. 17.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 167.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the different teaching methods espoused during the Hellenistic period, the Scholastic period, and in Kant's work, "The Conflict of the Faculties". The paper explains the approach to teaching expressed by each period and in Kant's concept of teaching and looks at the weaknesses and strengths of each approach. The paper concludes that the Hellenistic model is still a viable model because of its focus on eliciting truth through a logical, rigorous process and by inviting transformation within the individual and society.
The Hellenistic Period: The Importance of Argument and Rhetoric
The Various Hellenistic Schools
The Scholastic Period: A Precise Order for Text Commentary
The Importance of Curriculum during the Scholastic Period
Modes of Living: From "Nature" to the Intellect
The Importance of Transformation and the Role of Religion
Kant and the Hellenistic model
Ways in which Kant Revived the Hellenistic Model
Public Exposition
On Nature
Strengths and Weaknesses of Kant's Approach that We Have Inherited
Conclusion: Is the Hellenistic Model Still Viable?
From the Paper
"The Hellenistic period was marked by intense cultural, political, religious and athletic activity that continued to flourish under the Roman Empire. Social and political reform was prevalent, and undertaken by several philosophers including the Stoics and Epicureans. The Imperial period, in contrast to the Hellenistic period, was one where freedom of opinion existed, but in a much more curtailed form. There was a return to the "sources" of philosophy (namely the dialogues of Plato and the treatises of Aristotle and Chrysippus). Freedom of thought-although encouraged-was restricted and supervised by governmental authorities."
| |
|
'The Kritios Boy', 2006.
Examines the Hellenistic sculpture known as 'The Kritios Boy.'
1,533 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses a sculpture from the Hellenistic period of Greek art called the "Kritios Boy" (artist unknown), which was discovered in the late 1800s by archaeologists in the ruins of the Greek Acropolis in Athens. The paper examines how this statue represents Greek culture, especially the Hellenistic period, in a variety of ways and styles.
From the Paper
"This sculpture clearly illustrates how Hellenistic culture was evolving and changing. The statue includes movement, which makes it a more natural and realistic rendition of people and life of the time. Rather than appearing stylized and even overly rigid, this figure seems as if it could easily come to life, and that represents a great change in style and purpose of Greek sculpture."
| |
|
The History of Greece, 2008.
A review of Thomas R. Martin's "Ancient Greece: From Prehistoric to Hellenistic Times".
1,730 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Professor Martin's purpose for writing his book, "Ancient Greece: From Prehistoric to Hellenistic Times", and shows how he wrote an entertaining and highly informative book that encompasses the entire history of ancient Greece. The paper also looks at how the book depicts the history of Greece up to the Hellenistic Age when Greece prospered as never before.
From the Paper
"As the author of Ancient Greece: From Prehistoric to Hellenistic Times (Yale University Press, 1996), Thomas R. Martin is a highly-distinguished British scholar and educator and currently teaches at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts. He is also a Jeremiah O'Connor Professor of Classics and holds a Ph.D. in Ancient Studies. Within the last ten years, Professor Martin has worked for a number of scholarly institutions and has served as the chairman for several important archeological projects in Greece, Italy and the Near East. He is the author of several important books, a few being Peoples and Cultures from 1560 to the Global Age (2000) and The Making of the West: A Concise History (2002) which is currently used in many college and university classes as required reading material."
| |
|
Votive Statue of Eanatum and the Torso of Apollo, 2004.
An analysis and comparison of an ancient Sumerian sculpture and one from the Hellenistic period.
1,776 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The 'Votive Statue of Eanatum' is an example of a Sumerian sculpture that depicts a worshipper praying to a god, whereas the 'Torso of Apollo' (or Dionysus) is a very good example of a typical human sculpture of the Hellenistic period. This paper shows how the Sumerian and Greek sculptures differ artistically in some aspects due to the great time difference of their creation, yet they also seem to have several similar attributes. The paper also describes the historical settings in which the works of art were produced.
From the Paper
"After the death (323 BC) of Alexander the Great, his extensive empire was dissolved into many different kingdoms. This fragmentation was symbolic of the diversity and multiplicity of artistic tendencies in the Hellenistic period. It lasted up to 3 centuries, ending in 31 B.C. The variety of artistic directions makes a general statement about the sculpture of the period rather difficult. There was a tendency toward classicism; a tendency toward idealization, but also a tendency toward realism. The Hellenistic period was, above all, a period of eclecticism. Art still served a religious function or to glorify athletes, but sculpture and painting were also used to decorate the homes of the rich."
| |
|
Goddesses, Whores, Wives and Slaves, 2002.
The status and role women played in Hellenistic Greek life as compared to early Roman women.
925 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows a complete view of the life of early women in Roman and Greek cultures. First the life of Greek women and Roman women are discussed and then they are compared to a man's life.
From the Paper
"Since the beginning of our knowledge of classical antiquity, women have had many different social statuses. From goddesses to slaves and everything in between; women have been it all. The status of women generally improved in time as women gained power over their own lives. This is true of two comparable societies; that of the women of Hellenistic Greek culture and women of the early Roman Empire. Both had many similarities while they also had some very important differences. Men on the other hand, have had a relatively powerful and dominate role over women in this period of time."
|
|
|
