| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "HEALTH CARE COSTS REACTION": |
|
|
Health Care Costs: Reaction Paper, 2004.
Personal reaction to an assessment of family health care costs.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, APA, AU$ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents an assessment of the economics of health care costs. The paper argues that the problem is a complex maze of related issues such as funding mechanisms, delivery structures and individual responsibility. Additionally, the paper recommends a national health care system for managing family health care costs that is based on universal access to health care.
From the Paper
"Health care economics is entering another state of turmoil in the United States as the moderating effects of the managed care concept on increasing health care costs appears to have run its course. The Congress and state governments believed the promises of managed care proponents that managed care would lower health care costs dramatically and are resisting rapid increases in health care costs. Managed care companies are responding by dropping governmentally-funded patient groups including Medicare and Medicaid raising charges to..."
| |
|
Reducing Health Care Costs, 2007.
This paper examines the issue of health care benefits and costs.
2,938 words (approx. 11.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 126.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that a full-scale health care benefits crisis appeared to loom as employers were reported to spend $300 billion annually on the health insurance of employees, their dependents and retirees. Further, the writer discusses that health care related costs and premiums were expected to adversely affect the U.S. economy and, therefore, these preferred strategies could not continue indefinitely without a proportionate and adverse impact on total employee compensation. The writer looks at how employers act to reduce health care costs.
From the Paper
"The mass media, major consulting groups and health care experts agreed that health care costs were a critical or significant concern to the vast majority of chief operating officers, chief human resource officers and other business leaders. As against the estimated 14% increase, employers said they could accommodate only an average annual increase of 9%. This difference meant that employer costs would increase by approximately 54% in the next five years. During that period, employee contributions could increase three times until all the involved parties resorted to some proactive approach to contain the rise. HR leaders agreed that better value and lower health costs at between 83% and 96% if they worked together with employees for this purpose."
| |
|
Increasing Health Care Costs, 2002.
Looks at possible causes of increasing health care costs.
4,591 words (approx. 18.4 pages), 17 sources, APA, AU$ 174.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores all of the myriad and complex causes of the high cost in today?s health care environment and recommends changes that would be the most likely to positively impact change. Charts and graphs are used to help illustrate important points.
Introduction
Prescription Drugs
Medical Devices and Medical Advances
Rising Provider Expenses
General Inflation
Government Mandates and Regulations
Government Programs and Tax Laws
Increased Consumer Demand
Lack of Consumerism
Litigation and Risk Management
Fraud and Abuse
Managed Care System
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Priority Health also believes that the United States government is at fault for not imposing price controls on pharmaceutical products as do most other industrialized nations, thus leading to drugs costs that are as much as one hundred percent higher in this country. Additionally, the United States government imposes regulations for drug distribution and sales that make drugs less readily available and more expensive than in other countries. Also, government granted patents protect drug for up to seventeen years, limiting competition and driving up prices."
| |
|
Business Terminology in Health Care, 2004.
A research design to examine the reaction to business terminology in the health care industry.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 10 sources, APA, AU$ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Fifty years ago, though less was known about nearly everything involving the treatment of diseases, health care was a more personal experience. The rapidly changing health care system has caused patients to balk at service and the impersonality of it, and physicians and other providers to lament being unable to provide care in the way they would like to. This work is a proposed explorative study that will analyze the terminology used in health care to refer to the consumer and the provided services. Many are repeatedly disappointed by the expectation of the best possible care, regardless of the business parameters of delivery. Some have responded with an attempt to create a humanistic capitalism that respects the greater needs of the community and the individual, as well as respecting spirituality, yet this seems to be a difficult pill to swallow for consumer-driven organizations, regardless of their mission statements. This work proposes to gather information regarding the psychosocial effects of the use of business terminology in the health care industry in a bid to understand the psychological effects of referring to health care delivery as a business in terminology as well as reality.
From the Paper
"The Health Care Industry, idealistically is a large conglomeration of helping individuals and organizations whose sole purpose is to help people become more healthy, be that through prevention of disease or treatment of disease. Yet, it is known among nearly all health care professionals and almost all people who have ever been treated in the health care industry, even in the most minor way, which includes nearly all of the population, that the ?Health Care Industry? is just that, an industry. This industry is governed by profit and loss just as any other; possibly even more so in the sense that the more loss there is the less people can be helped."
| |
|
Health Care Costs, 2008.
A discussion of the rising costs of health care in the United States.
1,050 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 6 sources, APA, AU$ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the reasons health care costs continue to rise in the United States. It points out that many factors interact to increase costs and these factors include certain elements that, ironically, are thought to reduce costs or that may have been intended to reduce costs. The paper adds that costs increase in part for natural economic reasons, such as the cost of developing new drugs, or the added costs accruing due to the creation and implementation of new medical technology. The paper maintains that one of the primary reasons fo cost increases is that the public does not pay for what it uses in medicine, meaning that people do not pay directly out of their own pockets. Instead, millions have their costs paid by insurance or a company health plan, and this increases the overall costs. To conclude, the paper calls for a better and more certain analysis of how costs could be reduced.
From the Paper
"The patient may pay something on his or her bill, but it is usually only a part of the whole. Alterio (2007) notes how some of the efforts to control costs can harm patients, which in turn increases health care costs over time because patients may have to wait longer for treatment and need more medical attention when they do get it. Alterio notes that keeping down costs in HMOs often means requiring doctors to see more patients per hour and to give each patient less time, which saves money in the short-term while increasing costs in the long run."
| |
|
Rising Health Care Costs, 2004.
An overview of the reasons and possible explanations for the dramatic rise in health costs.
2,180 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, AU$ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how, although advances in medicine have meant that people live longer, they come with a price, which the medical aid schemes are typically required to cover. It looks at how the bottom line is that working people's premiums have to subsidize pensioners, who are the ones who usually require most of the care. It discusses how, as the cost of medical treatment escalates, a fine balancing act is also required to balance the books and how major chronic illnesses, such as HIV and various forms of cancer, are impacting the people who can pay health care premiums, as well as increasing the number of those who require a high level of medical attention.
Outline
Health Care Spending
A Brief Explanation
Utilization
Competition
Past Medical History
Medical Technology
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In the mid-1990s, Americans began spending more of each dollar on health care than on food or housing (Phelps, 1997). This new way of spending indicated that society can devote fewer resources to life's basics and more to resources to improving the quality of life. This was proven true when the prediction that health care spending would surge within the decade, had multiplied from one-seventh of the gross domestic product (GDP) to one-quarter of the GDP by the year 2000 (Strunk, 2003). According to Struck it continued from there because in 2001, health spending rose 8.7 percent, to $1.4 trillion, and accounted for 14.1 percent of the total economy, the largest share on record (2003)."
| |
|
The 1993 Health Care Plan, 2002.
An analysis of the insurance companies' reactions to President Clinton's 1993 health care plan.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 156.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will take a detailed look at the 1993 health plan and concentrate on the effects it had on the insurance industry. The prevailing sentiment among insurance companies was that the 1993 was unequivocally 'bad' for their business. After six years of lobbying and the application of economic pressure, insurance companies feel that the 1999 reforms are a step in the right direction after the botch-job launched in 1993. In brief, the paper will show what happened in 1993, how health care changed as a result of the 1993 plan, how insurance companies reacted to the plan, whether or not insurance companies acted rationally (i.e., is there economic support for their negative reaction?), and how the present situation meshes with the insurance companies' recommendations for change. .
| |
|
Access to Health Care, 2002.
Examines literature relating to the measurement of health care access in the United States.
921 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 9 sources, APA, AU$ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The measurement of access to health care in America is far from uniform. Even a cursory review of the literature reveals diverse methods, instruments and procedures for assessing access, each applied to diverse populations (e.g., poor, special needs, middle class, insured, uninsured, etc.) for diverse services (oncology, preventative care, prenatal care, etc.). This paper examines access to health care as related to the measurement of access and to the range of programs that have been developed to improve access. The writer's personal reaction to each issue is included in the report. The paper also includes articles referred to in the text.
From the Paper
"Access has also been measured in terms of whether a person has medical insurance or a regular source of care, or whether people use emergency rooms as their usual site of medical care (Wood, Hayward, Corey, Freeman & Shapiro, 1990). Additional access measures include whether insurance covers recommended care (Hubbell, Waitzkin & Rodriquez, 1990), the number of structural barriers confronting an individual or group seeking health care (Dutton, 1986), and the degree of expertise of a target group's service providers (McCoy, Aversa & McCoy, 1999). My personal reaction to this issue is to doubt the accuracy of access data. This is because each of these different measures must necessarily vary in the extent to which they have adequately operationalized the access construct."
| |
|
Medicare Reforms and Health Care Costs, 2004.
This paper is a research proposal to examine Medicare reform and determine whether it will actually end up costing taxpayers more money than the previous system did.
5,355 words (approx. 21.4 pages), 8 sources, APA, AU$ 193.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that, with the proposed reforms of the Medicare system, most people will not be able to use it because it would actually cost them more to do so than it would to simply not have insurance at all. The author feels that one of the biggest problems is that seniors who have Medicare do not have any coverage for prescription drugs, and because of this, they have to pay a large amount of money out of pocket., The paper stresses that the study, designed to be more of a subjective rather than an objective study, is based on the review of the available literature and the opinions and beliefs of those that make up this literature group because it does not appear that statistical research would be helpful.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Overview of the Study
Significance of the Study
Rationale of the Study
Scope of the Study
Review of Related Literature
Description of Sources Used
Positive Aspects
Negative Aspects
Literature Review
Methodology
Research Design and Approach
Procedures Used and Data Analysis
Research Considerations and Limitations
Validity and Uniqueness of the Data
Summary
From the Paper
"The sources used for this particular literature review did not come from the expected peer reviewed journals and magazines. This is largely because the Medicare reforms have not officially been enacted, and therefore studies into how they are impacting individuals who use the Medicare system have not been conducted. Because of this, there are few sources that can actually be found that deal with the Medicare reforms and how they are going to affect the elderly. At least, this is true of professional journals and official sources."
| |
|
Health Care Cost Containment, 2004.
A look at the rapidly increasing cost of providing health care services, one of the most critical issues facing health care facilities and organizations.
3,242 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 7 sources, APA, AU$ 136.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the critical problem facing healthcare facilities and organizations of providing quality care and services while at the same time maintaining very limited budgets. The paper points out that cost control and management can only be accomplished through innovative cost containment methods and effective data analysis related to facilities expenditures, operating expenses, and overhead expenses, and then makes recommendations for achieving these ends.
From the Paper
"One challenge that healthcare facilities face is the wide diversity of services provided by various facilities. No two healthcare providers is alike, and expenditures vary greatly from one facility to the next, based on the type of services offered to patients, equipment utilized and cost containment mechanisms in place within a facility. A blanket solution to cost containment is not therefore, possible within the world of healthcare because facilities vary so greatly in the services they provide. Thus each situation must be examined uniquely and separate from other competitors, in order to develop solutions that meet the need of a particular venture."
| |
|
The Rising Costs of Health Care, 2005.
A look at the issues concerning the rising costs of health care in the U.S.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 3 sources, AU$ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of rising health care costs in the United States, and relates the issue to the government, business, and health care industries. The paper further looks into these organization's roles in halting rising health care costs, and discusses professional opinions in relation to the matter. The addition of technology and its affects on health care are also discussed.
From the Paper
"In the United States there are many poor, aging, and young who have traditionally been without health insurance due to the rising costs associated with care. When society considers those entities that should play a significant role in reducing health care costs the organizational elements of government, industry, and health care providers them selves are logical considerations. Yet, while the United States patiently waits for some type of health care cost relief there does not appear to be any notable action being taken to reduce these costs. During the December 2002 online discussion posted on NewsHour, with Jim Lehrer, the issue of health care costs was discussed in relation to insurance providers, hospitals, and health care workers. Lehrer spoke with many professionals in these organizations, and discovered that there are primary causes for the rise in health care costs in the United States. "
| |
|
Quality And Costs In Health Care Services, 2007.
An analysis of the relationship between cost and quality in health care services in the United States.
1,640 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper researches the quality of health care services in the United States and analyzes the relationship between cost and quality in health care services. The paper examines the role of four agencies in addressing quality in healthcare - the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Finally, it addresses the implications to the profession of nursing relating to cost and quality in health care and particularly relating to advanced practice nurses.
Table of Contents:
Objective
Introduction
Review of Institute of Medicine Report
Role of Four Identified Agencies and Quality in Healthcare
Healthcare Cost and Quality and the Implications for Advanced Practice Nurses
From the Paper
"It is extremely important in view of the limited supply of workers in today's health care workforce that the APN be highly educated, highly trained, and experienced to a great degree in health care service delivery. The APN must know the policies and regulations of agencies that regulate and monitor the health care organization. The APN must be well versed in indicators, procedure and protocol in order to avoid medical errors either in failing to test, monitor, or instruct the patient. The scope of the APN's duties require that the APN be technologically savvy, detail oriented, and conscious of all procedures and checks that will avoid useless and avoidable medical errors in the health care organization which has employed them. The APN must play an active role in development of education for nursing future APN's. The APN must furthermore, actively document the effectiveness of the APN role for the purpose of gaining the trust of the public in the quality of care received which has been provided by the Advanced Practice Nurse and in a cost-effective manner while showing that APN provided care is highly successful in avoidance of useless and avoidable errors in the health care organization."
| |
|
Health Psychology Reaction Paper, 2008.
A paper describing two articles: "How Americans Are Living Dangerously", by J. Kluger and "The Science of Anxiety" by C. Gorman.
805 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 2 sources, APA, AU$ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews two articles: "How Americans Are Living Dangerously", relating to how Americans perceive risks and the second article "The Science of Anxiety" dealing with the phenomenon of anxiety and its effects. The author explains that both articles were written for a readership of lay people unfamiliar with the field of health psychology, and points out that although the articles are informative, they lack credibility of an article from more specialized publications.
From the Paper
"The article is comprehensive in that it compiles the opinions of many experts in risk assessment. It is a multispecialty field, comprised of neuroscientists, psychologists, risk consultants and other academicians in various fields related to risk. Direct quotations from these experts are used often to emphasize points made by the author. The article is written in a type of "inverted triangle" format used such that it attracts attention before discussion of facts in a logical manner such that the reader is engaged by both anecdotes and facts, interwoven to provide a flow that all readers are accustomed to. Technical jargon is explained by examples and are easily comprehendible, perhaps more so than through the use of the strictly scientific (but otherwise precise) definition. This is in stark contrast to the structured format adhered to by the academe, particularly journal articles. This is understandable, since laymen reading this article can absorb the essence of the article rather than details which may be of trivial significance to them.
"While the article is informative and presents much insight into the concept of risk, the article's target audience is left with "just enough" information to be able to process and assimilate it. While the information it provides is indeed useful in promoting well-being, there is a superficial essence to it. This is understandable, since anyone with a more formal educational background would have the tendency to scrutinize this - and any - article relevant to his field of study. In this case, while facts are presented on after the other, there is an unsettling paucity of alternative, negating or even contradictory explanations."
| |
|
Child Center Care Vs. Care by Family, 2007.
This paper discusses child care options and looks at the development of children who attended child care centers compared with those in family care.
3,054 words (approx. 12.2 pages), 12 sources, MLA, AU$ 130.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the question over who should care for children is once again being debated throughout North America, with many advocating that very young children be raised with either their mothers or a close member of the family instead of attending child care centers. The writer discusses research indicating that the poor quality of care given in existing centers throughout the United States is the reason for problems within the classroom, as children who attend these care centers are believed to have both development and social problems. The writer concludes that the important point of the debate over child care should be how to ensure quality care for children whose parents have to work, or have chosen to work, through understanding and enabling effective and positive child development and growth within center-based childcare.
Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
An Overview of Child Care in the United States
Contemporary Childcare in the United States
Towards an Effective Child Care System
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The changes in society over the past few decades have completely transformed the contemporary world, mainly through the consequences of warfare and the recent advancements in technology, which has also changed the lives of women. Accounting for almost half of the nation's workforce, a vast majority of them either are already mothers or will be, which means that something needs to be done about the childcare situation in America. Although center-based childcare is not, perhaps, the ideal situation for mothers and their children, most parents have little choice."
| |
|
Health Care and Managed Care, 2002.
Shortcomings of health care with the implementation of managed care.
4,150 words (approx. 16.6 pages), 17 sources, AU$ 221.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the shortcomings of the American health care system with the implementation of managed care. The risks and future trends in the system are looked at as well as examples of what the system has faced.
| |
|
Health Care Managed Care and Fee-For-Service Plans, 2000.
2,790 words (approx. 11.2 pages), 11 sources, AU$ 122.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the quality of care delivered by various forms of managed care organizations and fee-for-service organizations as reported by numerous recent studies.
From the Paper
"There is a current climate of distrust and frustration with managed care which has led many people to question whether health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other forms of managed care really are looking out for the best interests of their patients. Managed care plans have incentives in place which reward physicians and other health service providers for providing fewer services or less costly solutions. With American society?s negative feelings toward managed care medical practices, questions about the quality of care provided by various managed care institutions have been raised. The fact that managed care enrollment has been increasing while at the same time growth in total healthcare expenditures has been declining only serves to increase the frequency of questions about the quality of healthcare provided by managed care organizations. This paper will focus on the quality of care delivered by various forms of managed care organizations and fee-for-service organizations as reported by numerous recent studies."
|
|
|
