| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "HARRY S TRUMAN": |
|
|
Harry S. Truman, 2008.
An examination of the achievements of Harry S. Truman as President of the United States, focusing on the challenges that he had to overcome in this role.
1,621 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Harry S. Truman's life, as well as his history as a politician. The paper provides a background to his life, but focuses on his achievements as President of the United States. It also discusses Truman's first notable act as President, which was also his most notorious - the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August of 1945. In addition, the paper describes Truman's other achievements and focuses on the challenges that he had to overcome as president.
From the Paper
"Arthur Schlesinger Sr., the Harvard historian, was noted for (among other accomplishments) his polling of other historians and scholars in order to arrive at a list of "rankings" or ratings of the greatest Presidents in United States history; he conducted such polls in 1948 and again in 1962. His son, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., has followed in the footsteps of his father by conducting an updated poll in 1996. While some critics have noted that the great variance in presidential ranking polls may suggest that they are more subjective than objective (cf. Dean), Schlesinger's placement of Truman at number seven on his list of greatest Presidents may well be a testimony to the difficulties that Truman had to overcome during his two terms in office, and his strong personal intention to do what was necessary to get the country back on a peacetime footing in the face of a brewing Cold War (Schlesinger 179.) Given the subjective nature of such polls, there is no guarantee that Truman will remain in this position in future polls, as history has a way of being reinterpreted and placed into new contexts as new information comes to the surface with the passing of years; as a result, new and fuller perspectives may be expected to arise."
| |
|
Harry S. Truman, 2001.
A biography of Harry S. Truman, 33rd President of the U.S.
1,530 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A biography of the 33rd President of the United States, Harry S. Truman. The author examines his background, increased involvement in politics in his younger years and his political career later on in life.
From the Paper
"Harry S. Truman was born in Lamar, Missouri on May 8, 1884. He was the oldest of the three children of John Anderson and Martha Ellen Truman. The middle initial S. in his name is not an abbreviation, but a reflection of his family's reluctance to choose between his grandfathers' names, Shippe and Solomon. His family moved to Independence, Missouri, in 1890, where he had trouble participating in many boyhood activities because of his thick glasses and extreme nearsightedness. Because of this, he became interested in reading and playing the piano. These influenced his career years. His father had financial problems, so he never attended college, and because of his poor eyesight, he could not enroll in the U.S. Military Academy at West Point."
| |
|
Harry Truman, 2007.
A discussion of the success of Harry Truman as President of the United States.
2,090 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 6 sources, APA, AU$ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the life and presidency of Harry Truman. It begins by describing his life before he became President of the United States and then goes on to describe the events leading up to his taking over after the death of President Roosevelt in 1945. The paper discusses his choices during his presidency, particularly that of dropping the atomic bomb in 1945 and it discusses his leadership and decision-making abilities, as well as the secret to his success as a president.
From the Paper
"Their wedding began a 53-year union that would only end with Harry's death in 1972 at the age of 88. All throughout their marriage Harry continued to write letters to his beloved Bess. Historian Gesselbracht quotes another from 1948, "On June 28, 1948, Harry and Bess's twenty-ninth anniversary, Bess got a short letter from Harry. 'You still are on the pedestal where I placed you that day in Sunday school 1890. What an old fool I am.'" Fool or not, these romantic and sentimental letters show another side to America's 33rd president. They show that a great leader can still be loving, considerate, and devoted. They also show the great importance of healthy personal relationships for anyone in the public life. At a time when so many relationships last days instead of years, it is refreshing and inspiring to read again the loving words of Harry Truman. His love for Bess clearly helped him through difficult times, and made the joyous times even better."
| |
|
Harry Truman and the Steel Seizure Case, 1999.
A summary of how American President Truman seized control over the United Steel Workers of America in 1952.
1,541 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows how President Truman seized control over the United Steel Workers of America in 1952 and clashed with the Supreme Court over this decision. It examines how the Supreme Court overturned Truman's decision, claiming that the President had oversteppped his power and that his move was unconstitutional.
From the Paper
"It appears that over the years there have been many occasions when the President clashed with another branch of government, either Congress or the Supreme Court. This can be due to disagreements over the use or abuse of power. A typical example of this is the steel seizure case of 1952, which was when President Harry S. Truman seized control of the steel mills (Fisher, p.109). He claimed that his power as commander - in - chief brought him to this decision; however, the Supreme Court overruled the President's actions stating that he exceeded his authority (Brinkley, p.846)."
| |
|
Truman's Foreign Policy, 2002.
An examination of the contribution made by President Truman to the United States and its foreign policy and how other presidents have continued his legacy.
3,700 words (approx. 14.8 pages), 11 sources, MLA, AU$ 109.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a review of the main development in U.S. history under President Harry S. Truman from 1945-1951. It explores his foreign policy during the post WW II era and shows the many precedents he set. The writer then examines several of the Presidents who took office after Truman and how his foreign policy and legacy influenced their decision making policies. Presidents examined are Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Ford, Reagan, Bush and Clinton.
From the Paper
"President Harry S. Truman is considered by many to be one of the greater Presidents of the United States. Truman was Vice President for a few weeks before he became President on April 12, 1945. During his term as Vice President, he saw little of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and was not briefed on the development of the atomic bomb or of the United States' problems with Soviet Russia. When he became President, these problems became life. Truman later told reporters, "I felt like the moon, the stars, and all the planets had fallen on me." (Cochran, 1973)"
| |
|
Truman and Reagan, 2002.
Examines the foreign policies of two U.S presidents, Harry Truman and Ronald Reagan, and shows how one began and one ended the Cold War.
3,900 words (approx. 15.6 pages), 20 sources, AU$ 152.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
When Democrat Harry S Truman succeeded Roosevelt at the conclusion of World War II, he was committed to accommodating the Soviets and structuring a peaceful post-war global system. Before his Presidency ended, the United States was involved in an armed conflict in Korea, and the Cold War was firmly entrenched. Thirty years later, Republican President Ronald Reagan was elected on a strong anti-Soviet stance. A decade later, he had overseen the end of the Cold War. This discussion assesses the foreign policy of these two presidents and compares and contrasts the shifts during their time in office.
| |
|
Truman and Johnson: Crisis in Asia, 2006.
This paper examines the Korean and Vietnam wars as well as the various similarities shared by both President Harry S. Truman and President Lyndon B. Johnson during their terms in office.
2,958 words (approx. 11.8 pages), 2 sources, APA, AU$ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper explores the ironic similarities shared by Presidents Truman and Johnson, who both inherited the office of president at the death of their predecessors, both were extremely popular leaders and both died while in office. It is another irony that each president became embroiled in a war in Asia. This paper discusses both wars in detail as well as the events that led up to the conflicts including the fact that the Korean war set a precedent for the Vietnam War. This paper also examines the different leadership styles of both presidents, including the manner in which Truman kept firm control over the military while Johnson accepted most military assessments at face value. This paper also contemplates how these two conflicts effectively ended the public life of both Truman and Johnson, bringing an end to each one's administration.
From the Paper
"Earlier in January, 1968 the Tet Offensive attempt to take over the American Embassy had been a turning point in the war. Five of South Vietnam's six major cities, 36 of its 44 provincial capitals, and 66 of the 242 district towns were attacked. American losses were heavier than ever before, 3,895 men killed in eight weeks. South Vietnamese forces sustained much smaller losses, but there were an estimate 14,000 noncombatant men, women and children who were killed in the campaign. Although the Communist offensive was ultimately to lose 58,000 men in the offensive, the action drew even more dissent at home. The protestors were not now only the radicals and students, but mainstream voters were also increasingly expressing their opposition lining up in a groundswell of support for presidential Robert Kennedy, who pledged to end the war, as were members of the president's cabinet."
| |
|
Truman and Korea, 2004.
A look at how President Harry Truman's policies regarding the Korean War kept the war from becoming a third global conflict.
2,452 words (approx. 9.8 pages), 13 sources, MLA, AU$ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the significance of the Korean War in terms of how it tested, not the military power of the nations involved, but the will and strategies of the leaders of those nations. The paper recounts the events leading up to the war, outlines the main points of the Truman Doctrine, and explains how Truman's political acumen kept the Korean War from becoming the next World War.
From the Paper
"Following the use of atomic weapons on Japan to end WWII, Russia had developed atomic weapons also. Thus as the world entered the military playground called the Korean peninsula, each country was fearful of a conflict which would escalate to a level wherein atomic weapons would be used again. The prior generation's definition of victory, which is total victory at all costs, became a secondary goal to the prosecution of this war. This war was about forming alliances which would last into a lengthy cold war, and securing partners who could watch borders from around the world. Because of atomic weaponry, prosecuting a war was no longer defined by moving large amounts of men and equipment from one location to another. War became a much more strategic enterprise, and for the newly formed United Nations, and the two victors from WWII, the war was a test of how far they would go and still avoid all out war, rather how far they would go to win the conflict. As the world looked at the ashes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, everyone had a clear understanding that an all out war would create no victors."
| |
|
Truman's Rhetoric During the Cold War, 2000.
A review of President Harry Truman's rhetoric during the first years of the Cold War immediately after World War II and the following years.
2,751 words (approx. 11.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 87.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how President Truman's rhetorical style and manner of outlining the objectives and direction of American politics, brought a radical change to the rhetoric of American politics especially during the Cold War. The paper examines the phases that Truman's rhetorical context follows, focusing on his rhetoric in the first years of the Cold War just after World War II and the following years.
Outline:
Introduction
Propaganda during the Cold War
a) Period of Naivete
b) Period of Hysteria
Evaluation
From the Paper
"According to Medhurst (1988), between 1945 to 1947, Truman exhibited rhetorical failures by choosing the rhetorically "inappropriate strategy of silence and noncommitment" (p.54) when confronted with the inflexible and deceitful politics of the Soviet Union. Medhurst states that the President's rhetoric during this period, was reticent and one which failed to inform the Americans about the arising problems of Soviet "expansionism, intimidation and support for indigenous armed minorities" (p. 55). In fact, Medhurst defines Truman's rhetoric as a "rather laudatory of the Soviet Union" (p. 55) and points out that it was due to his forthright, clear and authoritarian rhetorical manner that lead to the perception that the Soviet-American relations were mildly positive. However, even though this authoritarian style attempted to portray the Soviet Union in a mildly positive light in the eyes of the American public, "rhetoric had not mirrored reality" (Medhurst, 1988, p. 56). Vague assertions such as "we shall refuse to recognize any government imposed upon any nation by the force of any foreign power" (as cited in Medhurst 1988, p. 56), stated by the President in a foreign policy address in 1945, "were as close as he would come to overt criticism of the Soviet regime" (Medhurst, 1988, p.56). "
| |
|
Truman's Demanding Decision, 2005.
A discussion of President Harry Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during WWII.
1,385 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the topic of the atomic bomb in Japan. Specifically, it discusses President Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb in Japan and why it was the proper decision for the time.
From the Paper
"When Truman took office after President Franklin D. Roosevelt died, he did not know about the development of the atomic bomb, it had been kept that secret. Roosevelt had created a nuclear program to look into creating an atom bomb several years before his death in 1945. In June 1942, this program was turned over to the army, and worked in Manhattan, and that is why it was code-named the "Manhattan Project." Just three months later, Enrico Fermi, the head scientist working on the project, created the first managed nuclear chain reaction. "'The event was not spectacular,' Fermi wrote in 1952, 'no fuses burned, no lights flashed. But to us it meant that release of atomic energy on a large scale would be only a matter of time'" (Szasz 14). The scientists kept working to perfect the process."
| |
|
Truman Doctrine, 2001.
U.S. aid to Greece and Turkey in President Harry Truman's administration. Relationship to Cold War. Examaines various policies and perspectives.
4,050 words (approx. 16.2 pages), 26 sources, AU$ 144.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research paper examines the relationship between the Truman Doctrine and the Cold War, as seen from the traditional, realist, revisionist and neo-revisionist points of view.
The Truman Doctrine is the name given to the rationale advanced by the administration of President Harry Truman to justify American economic and military aid to Greece and Turkey in the spring of 1947. It expressed a consensus among senior American policymakers, which was reached earlier, that the United States in collaboration with other European nations should resist and contain the threat of Soviet communist expansion in Western Europe and its periphery. According to the traditional school of thought, reliance on the policy of containment rather than negotiations had been necessitated by Soviet actions..."
| |
|
"Harry Potter": Evil or Educational, 2007.
This paper compares a pro-"Harry Potter" essay and an another anti-"Harry Potter" essay to determine which essay is more sound in its argument.
1,580 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, since J.K. Rowling published the first "Harry Potter" book, some parents, religious groups and educators have opposed the supposed 'controversial nature' of the books saying that they are evil, while other people feel they are educational and beneficial. The author points out that Courtney Strimel in her article "The Politics of Terror: Rereading "Harry Potter" did a better job of relaying her message because she listed many reasons why Harry Potter books help children and her reasons left little room for one to argue otherwise; whereas, while making good points, Berit Kjos in "Harry Potter Lures Kids to Witchcraft" gave too many opposing positions and left many unanswered questions. The paper asserts that, whether the Harry Potter books are harmful or worthwhile will continue to be debatable; however, in this case, Ms. Strimel's article was the better of the two because she made the more convincing argument by providing strong opinions, better explanations and relevant facts. The paper includes several quotations.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Evil: Berit Kjos' "Harry Potter Lures Kids to Witchcraft"
Educational: Courtney Strimel's "The Politics of Terror: Rereading "Harry Potter""
Comparison
From the Paper
"She discussed the effectiveness of the use of Harry Potter books in helping children cope with terrorism issues. She claims, "instead of making the series immoral, the magic, frightening storylines, and character ambiguity all operate together to explore a vast array of morality issues." She goes on to strengthen this argument by discussing several different issues in great detail. One such topic is terrorism, of which she states, "the lessons about terror in the Harry Potter series may be scary and confusing at times, but magical fantasy allows children to deal with timeless, realistic, frightening topics while maintaining a safe distance from the agent causing the anxiety." This is a strength because it is a very plausible and justifiable argument that shows a benefit to children reading these books."
| |
|
"Harry Potter", 2002.
An analysis of the character of Harry Potter in "Harry Potter And The Sorcerer's Stone".
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper discussing the changes in character of Harry Potter in the children's book "Harry Potter And The Sorcerer's Stone".
| |
|
Harry in "The Chamber of Secrets", 2005.
A character analysis of Harry in J. K. Rowling's novel, "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets".
1,102 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how, in Rowling's novel, Harry's character develops, revealing how he matures not only as a wizard, but a person. While still young in this book, Harry learns important lessons that will help him later in life. It explains that his unusual heritage provides the perfect backdrop for the story in that Harry must learn how to be brave and have faith.
From the Paper
"One interesting aspect of the novel is the voice that Harry hears early in the chapters. When Harry hears the voice say that it is "time to kill" (Rowling 137), his instinct to follow to voice in hopes to prevent it from doing any harm. This is a characteristic that Rowling continues to enhance with Harry. His instinct is to do good things and prevent evil from occurring, yet the voice is something that Harry does not understand. This lack of understanding is the source of much angst for Harry and he must learn to deal with it in a positive manner."
| |
|
The Truman Administration, 2003.
An analysis of the foreign policy developments of the Truman administration.
1,610 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, AU$ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper considers the foreign policy developments of President Harry Truman. It covers the use of the atomic bomb, the Marshall Plan, the Truman Doctrine and Korea. It also includes a reflection on current foreign policy departures from Truman's concepts.
| |
|
Truman and the Cold War, 2007.
This paper analyzes the successes of President Truman's foreign policy.
702 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the Korean War, the Berlin Airlift and the policy of containment as the events that signified President Harry Truman's foreign policy. The paper discusses Truman's effectiveness as president, his role as a policy maker and his effects on the Cold War.
From the Paper
"The death of President Franklin D. Roosevelt marked the end of an era and the change that would take place as a new president, Harry Truman came to power. Truman would take Roosevelt's policy of trust and turn it into one of suspicion. It was once commented that: "Harry Truman was certainly one of the greatest of recent American Presidents, especially with regard to foreign policy." Truman was not the greatest, as many of his actions fueled tensions of the Cold War. He did however, attempt to maintain peace and make a concerted effort to "do the right thing," for his country."
|
|
|
