| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "GUN CONTROL DEBATE": |
|
|
The Gun Control Debate, 2004.
This paper provides an analysis of the gun control debate in America.
2,260 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 8 sources, AU$ 115.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines the gun control debate in the United States of America. The writer provides a review of the studies that relate to that debate. The history of gun control as an issue in American society is discussed in this paper. The writer argues that gun control policies should not be expanded and presents both sides of the control argument.
From the Paper
"Gun control has been a prominent issue in American politics since Revolutionary War. The Founding Fathers gave American citizens the right to bear arms in the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The debate over the government's ability to regulate the sale and use of guns can be most simply stated as a fundamental conflict between the rights of the citizen versus the need of the government to assure public safety. Opponents of gun control believe that any infringement of an individual's right to bear arms is unconstitutional and ... "
| |
|
Gun Control and Gun Trafficking, 2008.
This paper examines the relationship between gun control and gun trafficking.
2,050 words (approx. 8.2 pages), 17 sources, APA, AU$ 94.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer researches the relationship between gun control and gun trafficking in an argumentative style of work with the goal of persuading a college-educated audience of the consequences of tighter gun control. The paper uses a supply and demand argument such as in the case of alcohol and prohibition and the current issue of illegal drugs versus legal drugs. The writer concludes that gun control does not deter crime and it is just as clear that gun control has not slowed down the trafficking of guns but in fact research shows just the opposite effects of gun control. The writer maintains that there are several provisions within the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights that are not cohesive with gun control laws and that the citizens of the United States must take issue through contacting their senators and representatives concerning gun control legislation in the future.
Outline:
Objective
Background
Legislation Relating to Gun Control
U.S. State Department Report
Opponents to Gun Control
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"This convention confirmed that 40% of individuals are gun owners presently. The convention notes that study findings show that the murder rate in New York City was not shown to go up or down with the rate of murders in which guns were involved. Guns are more expensive to own in Los Angeles than in New York City however, the proportion of murders with guns was much higher in Los Angeles than in New York City. The argument is presented by panelist Roth that gun violence is not necessarily deterred through low ownership of guns. The work of Koper reports that federal regulations that require gun dealers to report sales involving multiple guns is advisable and helpful in tracking down gun traffickers. Also reported is that laws restricting gun purchases in specific time periods is also effective in deterring gun crimes."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2002.
A look at both sides of the gun control issue in the United States and an argument against gun control.
3,240 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 12 sources, APA, AU$ 136.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Gun control is a heated issue in political, social and religious circles. The paper discusses the philosophies and arguments of both camps. It describes how those who favor gun control claim it will stop the senseless murders which are on the increase in American society. The paper argues that although gun control looks good in theory, there are many reasons why it is not a plausible idea such as the fact that it is undemocratic and it will not remove the guns from the hands of criminals. The paper particulary focuses on the way that the issue of gun control has becoming so political in nature over the years.
From the Paper
"Gun control proponents have on their side the funding of many environmental groups while the anti gun control camp has the power and funding the National Rifle Association behind them(Cannon, 2000). The teams square off in many arenas including political, educational and moral debates. The Million Mom march was about guns as have been the national rallies held by the NRA at key political times in the nation?s history. Each side provides celebrities to help their cause(Cannon, 2000). The NRA has famed actor Charlton Heston who was president of the club for several years and traveled the nation speaking out against gun control, while the gun control advocates have Rosie O?Donnell on their side. Great controversy arose when it was discovered that O?Donnell, has hired and armed body guards for her three children(Cannon, 2000). She promotes gun control however, from the standpoint that the body guards are trained and licensed in the operation of weapons not to mention registered. Regardless of which side one is on in the debate there are points to be won for everyone. When all is said and done however gun control goes against everything this country stands for and therefore would be a mistake of tremendous magnitude(Cannon, 2000)."
| |
|
Costs and Benefits of Gun Control, 2002.
Analysis of the economic costs and benefits of gun control and comparsion of the the arguments both for and agains gun control.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 8 sources, AU$ 103.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This research paper examines and analyzes the economic costs and benefits of gun control in the United States. The positions of gun control advocates and the gun lobby are compared and conclusions reached accordingly.
| |
|
Gun Control in the United States, 2004.
This paper stresses the importance of the legal issues surrounding the debate over gun control in the United States.
800 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses that the argument for or against various forms of gun control in the United States hinges on the Second Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights, which definitely provides a right to bear arms; however, the exact context and act of bearing these arms have come to the forefront of the debate. The author points out that the decision in the only modern U.S. Supreme Court case "United States v. Miller" (1939), which directly addressed the reach of the Second Amendment, indicates that the Second Amendment has to be interpreted with some leeway and not literally. The paper relates that the Second Amendment leaves room for question, which so many passionate gun rights and gun control activists so confidently assert.
From the Paper
"What exactly do gun rights activists and gun control activists say? Gun rights advocates believe the Founding Fathers guaranteed our security with the right to defend ourselves, our families and our country. The main gun rights organization is the National Rifle Association. The NRA attempts to describe the debate as those who believe in the Second Amendment, versus those who do not. They claim the Founding Fathers guaranteed this freedom "because they knew no tyranny can ever arise among a people endowed with the right to keep and bear arms.""
| |
|
Gun Control, 2005.
An examination of the controversial issue of gun control. The writer takes an anti-gun control stance.
1,761 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 9 sources, MLA, AU$ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues gun control is a law that should exist to some extent, but that should not violate the right, as set out by the U.S. Constitution, to bear arms. It explains that there is no evidence proving that gun ownership increases the likelihood of any crime or accident if the gun is stored and used properly.
From the Paper
"There exists a long-running debate concerning the question of whether owning a gun increases the likelihood of becoming a victim of crime, committing a crime that one would not otherwise have committed, or that household ownership of a gun increases the likelihood of death due to accident or suicide. Different studies have returned different findings and conclusions and it leaves one wondering exactly what the truth is and exactly what one should believe when contemplating possible gun purchase and household ownership of a gun."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2004.
A look at gun control laws in the U.S. and why they remain so weak in spite of strong support for gun control.
2,938 words (approx. 11.8 pages), 8 sources, APA, AU$ 150.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper addresses the question as to why the federal and state regulatory regime on guns remains so weak even though most American consistently and decisively support stronger national gun control laws. The paper considers the question in the context of single-issue voters and the historical background of the Second Amendment.
| |
|
Gun Control, 2002.
The paper discusses the concept of gun control and contends that one's own personal responsibility with firearms is far more important than gun control legislation.
1,024 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, AU$ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines two articles, one from a pro gun standpoint, contending that to own a gun one must be responsible for the use of the weapon. The second article looks at the history and reasons behind the creation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution and also lists empowerment and responsibility among reasons for gun ownership. The paper concludes that education is paramount in publicizing the advantages and dangers involved in gun ownership.
From the Paper
"Gun control is a heated topic in both American politics and in civil discourse throughout the nation. The issue has had a profound effect on lobbyists and on the general public. Issues revolving around gun control and the constitutionality of both new and old laws constantly see media attention. Every time there is a school shooting or a justifiable homicide, large numbers of advocates for gun control and opponents against the issue arise. Indeed, the politics of gun control and the rights of gun ownership inspire heated and emotional debates throughout the nation."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2004.
This paper discusses gun control in foreign countries as examined on a site published by the NRA-ILA, which examines gun control legislation and its subsequent impact on crime in countries, such as the United States, Japan, Switzerland, the UK, and German
1,315 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the NRA-ILA site indicates strict firearms legislation does not necessarily correlate with a reduction in crime rates; rather, the more severe firearm legislation, the greater incidence of crime. The author points out the site suggests that, in countries where authoritative governmental systems seem to dominate, stricter legislation is generally more often enacted. The paper states that, in countries where strict gun legislation is enforced, private sellers have less opportunity to make money on the firearms business than in countries where legislation is weaker.
From the Paper
"The study also suggests that that generally, foreign countries having less restrictive firearms laws witness lower crime rates, when compared with areas of the U.S. that have strict gun control legislation and subsequent higher crime rates. According to the report also, in Switzerland, many citizens actually are in possession of fully automatic rifles within their home, yet the abuse of military weapons is generally considered rare (Halbrook, S. ?Target Switzerland.? Library of Congress, pp. 183-184). In fact, the Swiss own in general more than two million firearms and generally shoot ?about 60 million rounds of ammunition per year? (NRA-IRA, 2001). Japan is an example however of a country where strict gun control legislation is has been enacted yet the crime rate remains high, suggesting that legislation alone may not be to blame for crime rates in general."
| |
|
Gun Control Laws, 1990.
This paper discusses gun control laws: Firearms, accessibility by the general public, the rising rate of armed robberies, aggravated assault and homicides, gun control solutions and pro and con.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 92.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
""A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security o a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." -- Second Amendment to the Constitution
The words of the Second Amendment, written two centuries ago, lie close to the heart of one of the most divisive issues in contemporary American public life: gun control. On the one hand, gunfire claims a constant, daily toll of American lives, from suicide and accidents even more than from violent crime. Every year or so, a mass murderer, often armed with one or more semiautomatic military-type assault weapons, mows down a dozen or so victims. On the other hand, gun ownership is a core value to millions of Americans, and perhaps a majority of all American ... "
| |
|
Gun Control Laws, 2007.
An argument in favor of tightening gun control laws in the United States.
1,309 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the controversial topic of gun control in America. It explains the argument that gun control will save lives and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and gangs. It then presents the other side of the debate, that the Second Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right to own guns, and that control is anti-American. The paper concludes that tighter gun control laws are necessary and discusses how to achieve these laws.
From the Paper
"Recently, ABC World News Tonight reported on gang violence in Palm Beach, Florida, an upscale retirement community in South Florida. Gangs have taken over much of the city, and they use automatic weapons to maintain control. Reporter Pierre Thomas says the Palm Beach Police Department faces enormous firepower in attempting to deal with these gangs. He notes, "His [the Palm Beach Police Chief's] department routinely faces enormous firepower on the streets they patrol, and a majority of the shootings are from assault rifles and AK-47s, which are easily hidden from plain view" (Thomas, et. al). In one shooting in January, an 8-month old baby was killed in her car seat during a drive-by shooting where over 30 rounds were fired (Thomas, et. al). Palm Beach is not an isolated community. The Brady Campaign notes, "In 2002, nearly 8 children and teenagers, ages 19 and under, were killed with guns everyday" ("Firearm Facts"). Gangs are routinely becoming involved in organized crime activities such as drugs and prostitution, and they use their high-powered weapons to intimidate victims and maintain control over other rival gangs."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2006.
A look at the discussion and debate surrounding the issue of gun control.
1,672 words (approx. 6.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, AU$ 79.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the debate over gun control by limiting the related arguments to the questions of whether an individual should have the right to bear arms in the United States today and whether depriving the individual of the right to bear arms would constitute an infringement of basic civilian rights. The paper concludes that, instead of banning firearms completely, it would be wiser to control their usage and ownership in a variety of well-regulated manners.
From the Paper
"In September of 1787 the United States Congress approved the Second Amendment which ensured that the rights of the American people to "keep and bear arms... shall not be infringed." [1] Although this amendment was designed to establish a "well-regulated militia" in America, it has been hotly disputed ever since. It was first legally argued in 1837, when the court case Nunn v. State banned handguns in Georgia and was later overturned by the Supreme Court as a violation of constitutional rights. However, those same rights didn't apply to slaves, and the 1850s saw a rash of laws which prohibited them from bearing arms. Even when slaves were emancipated in the 1860s, southern states still upheld these "Black Code" laws."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2005.
A look at the Bush Administration's policy towards gun control.
987 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Gun control and laws regulating this issue in the United States have been a controversial topic of debate for more than a decade. This paper explains that since the inception of extreme gun control laws in the late 1980s, the debate of how much crime is really prevented by gun control laws has raged on. The writer explains that it appears that the government and other anti-gun extremists have sided together against others in society who feel that public possession of guns should not be subjected to such extreme laws. The writer provides an exploration of these varied opinions, including that of the Bush Administration, some of its opponents, the National Rifle Association (NRA) and issues sparked by the Brady Law.
The Bush Administration
The National Rifle Association
The Brady Law
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The 1994 assault weapons law entails that the manufacture and importation of certain types of semi-automatic rifles are banned, along with magazines of more than 10 rounds. Public outrage and debate has been sparked by an assertion from the Bush administration that this law will be reauthorized, as it was set to expire in September 2004. The Libertarian Party acts as one of the representatives of the public outcry. According to the Party, the fact that the President has renewed the ban on assault rifles results in a certain message being relayed to terrorists and criminals in the United States. Indeed, specifically the objection is that homeland security is being undermined by a law that is primarily aimed at law-abiding citizens. Criminals on the other hand deem themselves above the law, rendering any gun control laws obsolete and absolutely ineffective. The Party argues that Americans are vulnerable to criminals when they are not allowed to protect themselves. Furthermore it is said that the government cannot protect everyone in the country at the same time, and the only other reasonable recourse is to let law-abiding members of society protect themselves. The law then, according to these critics places power in the hands of criminals and terrorists, while disempowering those in society most in need of protection."
| |
|
Gun Control: The Public's Opinion, 2005.
A look at public attitudes concerning gun control over both short-term and long-term.
2,914 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 10 sources, MLA, AU$ 126.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the majority of Americans oppose outright bans or severe limits on gun ownership and how a significant minority of Americans remain firmly opposed to many gun control policies and opinions on gun control, whether for or against. It attempts to explain why gun control policies have been slow to change, despite broad public support for tighter regulation of firearms and how, although support for gun control is strong, it faces significant opposition that has remained solid, despite public events such as the Columbine shootings.
From the Paper
"Supporters and opponents of gun control both agree that some means should be found to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. Yet, the two sides approach the issue differently. The two strategies for gun control involve "deterrence" (discouraging by instilling fear) and "interdiction" (legally forbidding the use). Advocates of deterrence, most notably the Second Amendment Foundation and the NRA, recommend consistent enforcement of current laws and instituting tougher penalties to discourage individuals from using firearms in crimes. They maintain that interdiction will not have any effect on crime but will strip away the constitutional rights and privileges of law-abiding Americans by taking away their right to own guns."
| |
|
Gun Control, 2002.
An argument for increased gun control in the United States.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss gun control and why we should have more laws protecting people from guns in this country. This study will show the forces that oppose gun control and an argument for more protection in gun control will be shown through the analysis provided. By presenting both sides of the argument, a better understanding of what gun control is needed will be understood.
| |
|
Gun Control, 2006.
An exploration of both sides of the arguments for and against gun control.
1,215 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the author explores both sides of the argument for and against gun control in America. He looks at how both sides differ greatly in their social and political views but use the same tools to argue and win support for their causes. The author uses the example, that the second amendment is interpreted in different ways by gun control advocates and opponents. The author concludes in his opinion that gun control is un-constitutional and is in direct opposition to what the founding fathers of America thought about gun control.
From the Paper
"History has shown that gun control efforts by a government have many times ended in tragedy. The most notable of these tragedies was the Holocaust, which was responsible for the murder of millions of European Jews. Not only did the Nazi weapon law of 1938 require that all German citizens register their firearms and obtain police permission to posses them, the law also prohibited Jews from possessing firearms. This obviously hindered the Jews' ability to defend themselves and their families against Nazi aggression. Although, in January 1943 in Warsaw, Poland, the Jews held off what was to be the final liquidation of their ghetto, by resisting the German Army with only ten pistols smuggled in by Polish citizens."
|
|
|
