| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "GOOD EVIL": |
|
|
Good And Evil, 2002.
Discusses the good and evil elements of human nature and what factors may influence a person to act in a good or evil manner.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the forces of good and evil and how man's character and nature is influenced by both childhood experiences and genetic composition. While in my personal opinion, a person's nature is dependent on his upbringing, some scientists maintain that there may be some genetic connection which urges a man to indulge in evil acts.
| |
|
The Good and Evil in Mankind, 2002.
A philosophy paper which asks the question: can man be defined as good or evil?
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the concept of whether man can be defined as being good or evil? Good and evil are a reflection of man's values. The paper argues that man must look to himself to define what is good and what is evil.
| |
|
Good Versus Evil in "Billy Budd", 2001.
This paper touches on the theme of good versus evil in "Billy Budd" by Herman Melville. It explains how Billy is the symbol of ultimate good and Claggart is the symbol of ultimate evil.
1,225 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the age-old concept of good versus evil in the book, "Billy Budd", by Herman Melville. The author provides an overview of the characters of the protagonist and antagonist, who respectively personify good and evil. Biblical parallels as drawn as well.
From the Paper
"Good versus evil is a very common theme in many different types of literature. One literary work which portrays the battle between good and evil very affectively is Billy Budd by Herman Melville. In this novel, good is portrayed through the character of Billy, while the character of Claggart portrays evil. The battle between good and evil is personified through the characters of Claggart and Billy."
| |
|
Good versus Evil, 2002.
This paper discusses the theme of good versus evil in different literary works.
1,215 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce and discuss good versus evil in two works, ?Young Goodman Brown,? by Nathaniel Hawthorne, and ?Hamlet,? by William Shakespeare. The paper breaks down both works and discusses the conflict between good and evil in both works. The author concludes that despite the struggles between the characters in both stories and how evil seems to triumph over good in both stories.
From the Paper
"There are many contrasts in Hamlet. There is the good in Hamlet that turns to evil when he seeks revenge. His mother loved his father, but is turned by greed and ambition into a schemer who marries when the old king is barely in his grave. Ophelia is a good woman, but Hamlet tells her he does not love her, and she should go to a nunnery. Yet, after he finds out about her death, he raves that he loved her. Shakespeare loves to use plot twists and contrast to set up the endings of his tragic plays, and Hamlet is probably one of the best examples of the darkness of these twists and turns
| |
|
Good And Evil Viewpoints Of Nietzsche, 2002.
Discussion of the differences between good and evil according to Freidrich Nietzsche.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Nietzsche is known for his viewpoints on good and evil philosophy. This paper discusses the difference between good and evil. Nietzsche is known for the values that continue to affect us today.
| |
|
Good and Evil in Doctor Faustus and Macbeth, 2002.
Discusses the themes of good and evil as they appear in "The Tragedy of Macbeth" and "The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus".
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper considers good and evil as they appear in William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Macbeth" and Christopher Marlowe's "The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus". The present study examines good and evil in both the conceptual form and what could well be termed its objective correlative; how each are embodied within the plays.
| |
|
The Struggle of Good versus Evil in ?East of Eden?, 2002.
A paper which discusses the concepts of good versus evil in John Steinbeck's novel "East of Eden".
945 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 0 sources, MLA, AU$ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A critical analysis of the complexities of good and evil in John Steinbeck's novel, "East of Eden", and a discussion on the way Steinbeck kept the depth of the biblical Cain and Able story with first the characters of Charles and Adam, and later with Cal and Aaron. The paper makes the reader question who is really evil, and who really is good.
From the Paper
"In John Steinbeck?s East of Eden, Adam is much like Abel, and has the love of their father. Charles is like Cain, and desires their father?s love. The father loves Adam while Adam does not love his father. Charles loves his father, and desires love from his father back. Charles is jealous of the love Adam receives from their father. Charles shows he is jealous when he worked for a present for their father, which gets rejected, like the fruit from Cain. Adam gives a puppy which his father loves. Charles tries to kill Adam at one point out of jealousy. Charles is a hard working, and seasoned man. Adam is a drifter that is nice to everyone, and chosen as the favorite child by their father."
| |
|
Good, Evil and Beowulf, 2008.
This paper examines the issues of good and evil in the modern translation of Beowulf by Alan Sullivan and Timothy Murphy.
1,217 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 1 source, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses that the theme of good versus evil and the importance of community support are evident in Alan Sullivan and Timothy Murphy's modern day translation of Beowulf. The writer explains that Beowulf, who is an honorable, strong and courageous warrior, sets out to protect the people of Heorot from the evils of the world, which are Grendel, Grendel's mother, and a fierce Dragon. The people of Heorot are a society who value honor, loyalty, and courage in one another and believe that strong community support is needed for survival. Beowulf is dedicated to his fellow men and strives for the greater good of all, especially in times of war. The writer notes that although Beowulf was never motivated by greed or selfishness, it is the decline in society's honor and loyalty which resulted in his tragic death. The writer concludes that he will be remembered and respected as an honorable, loyal and courageous warrior who left behind a legacy for all.
From the Paper
"Beowulf is dedicated to his fellow men and strives for the greater good of all, especially in times of war. Beowulf also deals with the Christian views of greed, selfishness and human behavior, along with its negative consequences. Beowulf's dedication to the people of Heorot never ceases, he is only as strong as the community support surrounding him. Although Beowulf was never motivated by greed or selfishness, it is the decline in society's honor and loyalty which resulted in his tragic death."
"Beowulf's strength and honorable character is not only an example of his father's upbringing but also of inherited traits. Beowulf, who was raised by a father who was a highly respected warrior of his time, learned the importance of a supportive community from an early age."
| |
|
"Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil", 2005.
Discusses dichotomy in John Berendt's "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil".
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 1 source, APA, AU$ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how the characters and the city of Savannah in John Berendt's "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" exhibit dichotomy. The paper maintains the dichotomies that pervade the novel are used to reinforce the mystery that remains behind in the wake of James Williams' shooting of Danny Hansford.
From the Paper
"In John Berendt's Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil we are pulled into a murder mystery in Savannah. The title of the book is important as is the statue in the garden that graces its cover ..."
| |
|
Good and Evil in Wuthering Heights., 2002.
This paper discusses that Wuthering Heights is an examination of Heaven, Hell, the Fall, questions of origin and the nature of good and evil.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 1 source, AU$ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Religious references abound--not surprising for the daughter of a clergyman--but her world view is far from the simplistic one of traditional Christianity. Good and evil, as are heaven and hell, seem inextricably intertwined in this wild setting. Rather than being two opposing forces, each resides in us. The real evil is committed when we go against our true selves, as Heathcliff and Catherine do. This may be seen, perhaps, most clearly in Bronte's depiction of place, and in the characters of the two lovers, Catherine and Heathcliff.
| |
|
Good vs. Evil, 2002.
An analysis of the concept of good versus evil in the novel "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding.
1,655 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 77.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper begins with a description of the book's questioning of the innate goodness of mankind. The ways in which the author demonstrates the split between good and evil, this dual nature of humanity, is explored through an examination of the story, setting and characters in the book.
From the Paper
"In his novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding forces us to question whether people are innately good, or whether what we call civilized behavior is only forced out of us as long as society demands it. In his vision as reflected by the novel, most of us need the constraint of society?s rules to remain civilized and not descend into an uglier form of life where cruelty and abuse of power are easily rationalized or even celebrated. He suggests that instinctively we may be barbaric, not good or kind.
He demonstrates this split between good and evil in several ways. He sets the novel during a period of great warfare, with Great Britain threatened by atomic bombs. The boys are being airlifted away from the danger when they crash land on the desert island. On this island, he uses the existence of beauty and ugliness together several times. Then there is the struggle between civilization and barbarism evident in the power struggle between Ralph and Jake."
| |
|
Good and Evil in "Harry Potter" and "Lord of the Rings", 2004.
A comparative analysis of the battle between good and evil in J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series and J.R. R Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings".
2,480 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 10 sources, APA, AU$ 109.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how a characteristic common to both novels and films is the spectacularly gripping battle that takes place between good and evil. It looks at how the protagonists of both stories struggle with a powerful, superhuman embodiment of evil - Voldemort in "Harry Potter", and Sauron in "The Lord of the Rings". It also looks at how juxtaposed against these hateful figures are characters possessing magical or mystical powers who command the fight for virtue and justice - exemplified in Dumbledore and Gandalf. Betwixt these two polar opposites are Harry and Frodo -the symbolic heroes, who, even though they fight determinedly against evil, still discover that they are connected to or tempted by the evil figure they are opposing.
From the Paper
"The stifling, materialistic world of the Dursley's, Harry's foster parents in Privet Drive, Little Whinging, and the pettiness and relative inconsequence of life for the Hobbits in the Shire both represent the ordinary world of the middle class. One of the contemporary dissatisfactions to which both stories respond is the general boredom with modern bourgeois existence. The escapism these stories provide is a remedy for the routine that is the curse of secure, stagnant middle-class life. In particular, Harry's repulsion towards the Dursley's provides an exceptionally adverse view of modern bourgeois life. It is this essentially cramped existence that Harry is keenest to escape, made manifest in the tiny dimensions of his cupboard under the stairs turned bedroom. "
| |
|
Good and Evil, 2002.
Examines the philosophies of Greek philosopher, Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes on the issues of good and evil in human nature.
891 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, APA, AU$ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Aristotle?s "The Nicomachean Ethics" sets out several of his most important principles, including basic definitions of good and evil, as well as a definition of happiness, which is in fact closely allied to the concepts of virtue and good. This paper looks at these Aristotelian definitions as put forth in his treatise on ethics. The paper then compares these classical ideals of good and virtue with Thomas Hobbes?s writings on these same concepts in his best-known work, "Leviathan".
From the Paper
"Hobbes argues that the natural state of people is violent and inclined to devolve toward the bestial. Aristotle argues that that the natural state of humans inclines towards the good; much of the arguments that he puts forth in The Nicomachean Ethics contains at its core the Platonic assumption that evil is simply ignorance and can be educated away. Aristotle firmly believes that everyone has it within himself or herself (although probably just himself in Aristotle?s case!) to become a better person through thought, observation, education, and experience (and of course the practice of philosophy). Not only does each person have this capacity, Aristotle argued, but has the moral obligation to try to improve."
| |
|
Good and Evil in Human Nature, 1992.
Compares Chinese and North American views on the inherent goodness of man, evil, God, free will and laws.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This study will examine the Chinese philosophic stance that human beings are inherently good, and will compare that view with the view of North American people and the explanation of the latter with respect to good and evil in human nature. The study will consider the appearance of evil in an individual if that individual is inherently good.
It is too simplistic to say without equivocation that the Chinese philosophers or the North American people believe that man is inherently good or not inherently good. For example, the pre-eminent Chinese philosopher, Confucius, can hardly be said to believe simply that man is inherently good, but it is nevertheless safe to say, in general, that Confucius did have a positive view of human nature.
The North American view, generally rooted in European ..."
| |
|
Friedrich Nietzsche's " Beyond Good and Evil", 2001.
An examination of Nietzsche's views on the "will," "free will," "unfree will," "physical body," "subservient body," and "cause and effect."
1,792 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 1 source, AU$ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is based on Nietzsche?s views on he ?will,? ?free will,? ?unfree will,? ?physical body,? ?subservient body,? and ?cause and effect? as outlined in his book "Beyond Good & Evil". The author attempts to write the paper in the same style as Nietzsche and builds Nietzsche?s definitions of the terms mentioned above and relates them to each other. The paper covers a number of important Nietzsche concepts.
| |
|
Freud?s "Civilization and its Discontents" and Nietzsche?s "Beyond Good and Evil", 2001.
The following paper examines the way in which Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche addressed the concept of human nature and of the society in which human nature was bound.
1,180 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper endeavours to explore the theories behind human nature, the impact of the world that Freud and Nietzsche were living in at the time, religion and approaching utopia through the works "Civilization and its Discontents" by Freud and "Beyond Good and Evil" by Nietzsche.
From the Paper
"Regarding human nature, Freud was reticent in purporting that we are inherently sinful, but rather that we come in this world full of Id. This wild, instinctive foundation is the basis upon which the infrastructure of the human psyche is erected. We are born into a dangerous world and we endeavor to evade pain and secure pleasure. Freud perceives the Id as a product of our evolutionary progress as Darwin outlined it (e.g. natural selection needs a conflict to ensue for staying alive as well as reproduction). So Freud?s assessment of human nature is rather cynical, we are fundamentally egotistical self-justifying pursuers of hedonistic satisfactions, which comprises aggression and sex."
|
|
|
