| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "GOD SMALL THINGS": |
|
|
Review of "The God of Small Things", 2007.
This paper explores gender roles and the "big" and "small" things in Arundhati Roy's novel "The God of Small Things."
1,146 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the book "The God of Small Things" from a perspective of gender roles. The book's author, Arundhati Roy, focuses her story not on the major events that shape a society, but rather on the small daily events that shape a home. In this paper, the concept of "big things" is evaluated in terms of the adult world and male world, while the "small things" are the realm of children and women. The paper analyzes the characters in the novel in relation to this idea.
From the Paper
"Arundhati Roy's book The God of Small Things has many instances where gender and the idea of "Big" and "Small Things" occur. In a society where there is caste system, political affliations, and marriage, she focuses on the "small things" which in turn can be taken with the gender roles of the novel. There are many characters such as Estha and Rahel that have strong personalities which play a distinctive role in the novel. Furthermore, the women characters in the novel seem to be transgressive of what seems to be acceptable. Roy forms her characters in a way where gender roles can be seen and political views can be taken."
| |
|
"The God of Small Things", 2002.
Presents a psychological examination of the novel "The God of Small Things".
3,650 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 8 sources, AU$ 193.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
"The God Of Small Things", a Booker Prize winning novel by Arundhati Roy, is a tragic story that renders rich psychological insights into the effects of India's political and social problems on an everyday family in their everyday lives; and illustrates in a powerful fashion the ways in which these problems can destroy both rich and poor people alike. This paper attempts to interpret the multitude of psychological meanings in "The God of Small Things".
| |
|
"The God of Small Things", 2005.
A review of "The God of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the book "The God of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy. According to this review, the "magical realism" and the "sound of small things" in the book are created by the perceptions of the characters themselves.
From the Paper
"The mythical sound of history, although often constructed of child-like phrasing and odd word strings, reverberates from Roy's text to create an ephemeral world that is much less tangible than the hard imagery of other modern novels. Some fasten terms like "magical realism" to her text or blame it on culture, likening her to Indian literary icons such as Salman Rushdie (Reena). Roy herself denies this, saying: No, what I am writing is what the characters are experiencing. What the reader is reading is the character's own perceptions. Those images are driven by the characters. It is never me invoking magic! This is realism, actually, that I am writing (qtd. in Reena)."
| |
|
Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things", 2005.
A look at the theme of betrayal in Roy's novel, "The God of Small Things".
1,481 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 1 source, APA, AU$ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes how Arundhati Roy demonstrates the theme of betrayal in her novel, "The God of Small Things". These acts of betrayal are detailed in the betrayal of children by adults, of individuals by society, of parents by children, and in the betrayal of history and tradition.
From the Paper
"The impact of betrayal is seen throughout the differing settings of the book; both when the twins are seven years of age in 1969 and when the twins have reached 31 years of age in 1993. Betrayal involves most of the characters in the novel: Rahel, Baby Kochamma, Estha, Chacko, Ammu, Mammachi, Sophie Mol, Murlidharan, and Velutha. As such, betrayal is an important theme within The God of Small Things."
| |
|
Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things", 2004.
This paper discusses Arundhati Roy's post-colonial novel "The God of Small Things" based on themes and symbols reflecting the latent memory of India's experiences with British imperialism.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Arundhati Roy in her post-colonial novel "The God of Small Things" weaves in social and political theories based on the sociological work of Paul Gilroy's "The Black Atlantic", Homi Bhabha's "The Location of Culture" and Dipesh Chakrabarty's "Provincializing Europe". The author points out that the story gives prominence to the enduring caste system in a country, which outlawed caste discrimination in 1950 but ironically emerges in Roy's modern India, now harboring strong Indian values within a setting where colonial influences still remain. The paper concludes that, through her use of irony, contradiction, themes and symbols of ambiguity, sly civility, historicism and the deconstruction of an imperial language construct; Roy is able to not only provide a post-colonial narrative but also a truly satisfying work of literature.
From the Paper
"In chapter 2, the family is in their Plymouth which has a plywood billboard attached to the roof rack, promoting the family business of pickles and preserves: there are painted pictures of jars juxtaposed with a kathakali dancer for "Regional Flavour." As the story unfolds, the reader is exposed to a description of a real kathakali dance, except it has been shortened from hours to a mere twenty minutes to accommodate the "short attention spans" of the foreign guests as they loll by the poolside at the Heart of Darkness Hotel (which is in itself an irony of "civilized" foreigners residing in a symbol of backwardness and primal roots). While one might see the truncated dance as Indian submission or alteration for the sake of the Western tourists, I believe it is in fact evidence of the opposite; a mockery of sorts of the foreigners. In a large sense, this is Bhabha's concept of hybridity in that the dumbed-down version of the play is a counter-narrative against the dominant culture, premised by the deconstruction of the very entry of the formerly excluded subjects."
| |
|
"The God of Small Things", 2008.
An analysis of the relationship of the twins in Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things".
1,140 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 0 sources, MLA, AU$ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how "The God of Small Things" is a story about a family living in the town of Ayemenem, India. The paper looks at how the story is about the loss of love, innocence and life and how it is a story that shows how adult corruption and scandals affect everyone around them, even those as innocent as children. In particular, the paper discusses how Estha and Rahel, a pair of "two-egg" fraternal twins share a connection so intimate and strong that it is almost impenetrable. Through the twins' experiences from childhood to adulthood, they learn that "things can change in a day", in other words, love and life can be lost at any moment.
From the Paper
"The theme of this book revolves mainly around the "small things". Since the adults care more about the "big things" like social class and family honor, "small things" are ignored by them. "Small things" are brought to our attention by the children and Velutha, the God of Small Things. One reason why he is the God of Small Things is because he is the only character besides the twins who enjoys the "small things" in life. Although he is involved with "big things" like being an Untouchable, he ignores his position in class and engages in "small things" like playing with the children and having an affair with their mother, ignoring the consequences that would ensue. Since Estha and Rahel are children, they are not tied to the world of "big things", thus only leaving them with the "small things" to deal with. They give readers a better idea of what childhood innocence is. "
| |
|
V.S. Naipaul's "Half a life" and Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things", 2002.
A linking essay on the two books in relation to culture and values.
1,750 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 81.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews two books of the post-colonial genre: "Half a life" by V.S. Naipaul and ?The God of Small Things? by Arundhati Roy. It looks at the books? respective comments on the culture and values of the authors. The thematic commonality of culture acceptance in the books is explored, as is the phenomenon of the ?push-pull contest? between cultures. The paper concludes with a list of similarities and differences between the two novels.
From the Paper
"The post colonial era in most areas provided the residents with a confusing state of existence. The old cultures were still in force, with all the traditions, beliefs and values that they held in the past, however the new cultures also had their place among the people. The post colonial era was a push and pull styled existence with the people living them caught in the middle of the apparent tug a war between cultures. The opposites of the cultures were handled in postcolonial writing by displaying the constant push-pull contest that seemed to be the norm for the time. Two popular works of fiction provide classic examples of this phenomona taking place for those who embrace the area as their home. In "Half a life" written by V.S. Naipaul and "The God of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy, the reader is treated to a wonderful comparison of ways that these opposite situations can be displayed and enjoyed through the way it is expressed by the author."
| |
|
Deal with the Small Things the Big Things will Follow, 2002.
A look at the Broken Windows Theory in connection with acts of crime.
1,595 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed look at the Broken Windows Theory. The writer of this paper provides the reader with an overview of the theory as well as some examples of where the theory would apply. In addition the writer argues that the theory is correct and if minor offenses were more harshly judged and punished then larger crimes would be deterred.
From the Paper
?As we go through history we see crime that is becoming increasingly violent. We have children killing children, people climbing clock towers and taking aim at innocent residents and serial killers seem to be on the rise. We also have gang related violence occurring each day as well as robberies and stabbings. Car- jackings have become a past time it seems and those who are victims of it are often brutally beaten before they lose their car. Everywhere we turn violent angry crimes seem to be more accepted than ever before.?
| |
|
"The God Of Small Things", 2002.
Discusses the book by Indian writer Arundhati Roy.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 1 source, AU$ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An analysis of the book "The God Of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy, who is against the societal hypocrisy in Indian society.
| |
|
Raymond Carver: "A Small Good Thing", 2001.
An analysis of his novel "A Small Good Thing" and contributions to the literary world.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 83.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the influence of Raymond Carver on the American Literature and also studies his work "A small Good Thing" in the light of the criticism made against his writing style. Raymond was a major influence on the literary circle in the 1970s and it was when he shot to fame wit his wonderful short stories.
From the Paper
"Raymond Carver is known as one of the most influential writers in contemporary American literature because of his simple style f writing, use of informal everyday language and smooth flow. The writer shot to fame with his short stories, which were set in modern day America, there were no high profile personalities in his works; the people and their lifestyles were that of an average American. (Claire Dederer, 2001) The issues Carver talked about were so downright simple and the titles so amazingly colloquial that the reader is often left with a feeling of awe. Raymond was praised by many and criticized by some, but none can deny that he had a major influence on the literary circles in 1970s."
| |
|
"A Small Good Thing" and "Babylon Revisited", 2002.
A look at the issue of class difference in Raymond Carver's " A Small Good Thing" and F.Scott Fitzgerald's "Babylon Revisited"
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 64.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how class differences play a role in both Raymond Carver's " A Small Good Thing" and F. Scott Fitzgerald's "Babylon Revisited." It analyzes how income and relative social prestige affect the relationships between the characters in the stories. It also takes as look at many class related social interactions between the characters in the stories.
| |
|
Small Classes, Small Schools, 2005.
Argues that classrooms and schools should be small if they are to be places where students' personal and learning needs are met.
2,359 words (approx. 9.4 pages), 11 sources, APA, AU$ 104.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
For many years, educators have debated the effects of class size and school size on student learning. The class size debate centers on the number of students a teacher can work with effectively in any given class period. The school size issue focuses on whether smaller schools encourage optimal student learning and development and how small a "small school" must be to produce such effects. By looking at articles and texts on the subject, this paper examines why issues of class and school size have gained prominence in recent years. It looks at what the research says and finally shows what the author's experience has led him to believe about the impact of class and school size on teaching and learning.
From the Paper
"When I began teaching in the early 1970s, teachers generally accepted the notion that some students had an exceptional aptitude for learning and others did not. At that time, my colleagues and I believed that as long as one-fourth of the students in a class performed exceptionally well and another half of the class did reasonably well, we were fulfilling our responsibilities as educators-even if one-fourth of the students in a class failed to learn at an acceptable level. We had been taught that the normal distribution of scores (the "bell curve") was what teachers should aim for and what we should accept as reasonable evidence of accomplishment. In the ensuing years, cognitive scientists, neurological biologists, and educators determined that all students have the capacity to learn. This new, convincing research means that no student should be left behind in the learning process."
| |
|
Sibling Relations, 2004.
This paper discusses sibling relations in Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things."
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explores sibling relations in Arundhati Roy's novel "The God of Small Things." The paper discusses the novel's theme of the intimate relationship between the characters of the twins.
From the Paper
"Sibling Relations in "The God of Small Things." In "The God of Small Things" Arundhati Roy says that there are things that you can't do, like writing letters to a part of yourself. This statement emerging from the mind of the female twin named Rahel establishes the theme of the novel with respect to the intimate relationship between twins."
| |
|
The Theme of Conformity, 2008.
A comparison of the theme of conformity in "The God of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy and "Housekeeping" by Marilynne Robinson.
2,170 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 97.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the themes in two novels - "The God of Small Things" by Arundhati Roy and "Housekeeping" by Marilynne Robinson. It focuses on the themes that these two books share - those of the restrictiveness of conformity and what happens when these confinements are broken. The paper then looks at the negative consequence on the characters in the novels as a result of breaking out of their confinements.
From the Paper
"It is apparent through these two books that once rules and conformities are broken, chaos or some sort of disorder ensues. What is similar from these two books is that it is always the community around them that gives the families grief. Whether it be death or separation, it has been acknowledged that "it is a terrible thing to break up a family." The consequences for breaking laws and conformities in God of Small Things is the death of Velutha, banishment of Ammu, and separation of Estha from his mother. This all result in the breakup of an entire family. The consequence for breaking conformities in Housekeeping is the threat of having a family separated and the wipeout of one's identity. Sylvie and Ruth are dead to the people of Fingerbone now because they have chosen to live a life of their own. Perhaps these two authors are suggesting that society will always win regardless. It is useless to fight the rules because doing so will result in tragic endings."
| |
|
Karna And The Physics Of Power, 2002.
Discusses the story of Karna and its relation to the "physics of power" as presented in Arhundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, AU$ 51.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In chapter 12 of "The God of Small Things" by Arhundhati Roy, the author ushers us into a performance of the story of Karna from the "Mahabharata", as presented by kathakali dancers in the empty temple in Ayemenem. The paper explains what the story of Karna can teach us about the "physics of power."
| |
|
Post-Colonialism Literature, 2005.
This paper compares the family's post-colonial experience in two novels Chinua Achebe's"Things Fall Apart" and Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things".
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 3 sources, AU$ 128.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an analysis of how families were fragmented or even destroyed as part of the post-colonial experience as expressed in two novels "Things Fall Apart" and "The God of Small Things". The author points that, in each book, the experience is quite different. The paper relates that Achebe's book uses a mixture of destruction and potential; whereas, Roy focuses on instability.
From the Paper
In both Things Fall Apart and The God of Small Things, the same patterns are observed to be transmitted through the family over generations. However, whereas hatred for the parent and a refusal of identity with him are seen in Achebe's novel, in Roy's work the pattern manifests itself in dysfunction, alienation from self and social problems. The source of these patterns is located in transgressions of the most crucial cultural norms and the price to be paid. Family composition in the two novels is diametrically opposed in terms of visibility of gender.
|
|
|
