| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "CAPITALISM": |
|
|
Human and Physical Capital, 2002.
Examines which is more important for economic growth - human capital or physical capital.
3,150 words (approx. 12.6 pages), 6 sources, AU$ 123.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
It is the objective of this paper to highlight the exigency of the ionisation between human capital and endogenous economic growth. A brief digest of the evolution of modern growth theory will be provided, with particular attention being paid to growth models that account for the importance of human capital in the contemporary economic environment. The analysis of this paper will remain limited to the importance of human, and to a lesser degree, physical capital, in economic development.
| |
|
Capital Punishment, 2005.
This paper discusses the problems of juveniles who commit capital crime, and the use of capital punishment for this age group.
1,610 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the recent Supreme Court opinion for Roper vs. Simon mandated that juveniles who were sixteen and seventeen at the time of their crimes could no longer be legally sentenced to be executed. The author points out that the issue of immature brain of even older teens does bring enough of a question into a minor's ability to make rational decisions. The paper stresses that juveniles should never be executed and the efforts to attempt to rehabilitate should always be applied.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Trends in Capital Punishment
Sentencing
Crime by Juveniles
Debate
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Criminal history plays a strong influence on the sentencing guidelines based on the fact that repeat offenders are often considered to be more dangerous to society. But, however real or unrealistic it is, the overall objective of sentencing is to always rehabilitate the perpetrator - even life sentences. Life imprisonment does have a light at the end of a tunnel in many cases and has statistically been considered to be a sentence of approximately twenty years behind bars. The exception to rehabilitation is of course the capital offense that requires execution."
| |
|
Intellectual Capital, 2005.
A look at how to best manage the intellectual capital in an organization.
5,513 words (approx. 22.1 pages), 34 sources, MLA, AU$ 143.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the best ways to develop, engage, and manage the intellectual capital of an organization. The paper also emphasizes that an understanding of the needs of the organization, the industry, and the market is the most effective way of harnessing a business's intellectual capital.
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Discussion
Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management
Types of Intellectual Capital
Intellectual Capital and Worker Motivation
Hindrances Towards the Development of Intellectual Capital
Intellectual Capital and Adaptation of Technology
The New Age Worker
From the Paper
"It is estimated that 80% of all global organizations have some form of 'Knowledge and intellectual capital management' models implemented in their operations; 96% predict that they will do so in the next five years. (Kulik, 2000) In addition, 25% of organizations had a chief knowledge (management) officer. Approximately, 53% had knowledge and intellectual capital management staff and a dedicated knowledge and intellectual capital management budget. It has been observed that variables such as personal cognitive styles and local customs and beliefs may affect the models and implementations of any intellectual capital and knowledge management program. It is critical therefore, to understand the local culture and beliefs and their influence on how the local society places emphasis on knowledge and the application of this knowledge to the industry."
| |
|
Social Capital, 2003.
An analysis of social capital as the currency of civil society.
1,115 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 9 sources, MLA, AU$ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how social capital is the currency of civil society by demonstrating the role of its mobilisation within social movements. It proposes that social capital is the currency of civil society in much the same way that financial capital is a component of the market sector. The first section briefly outlines three integral elements of social capital, networks, norms and social trust. It is followed by a discussion of the mobilisation of social capital as it pertains to social movements and promotes civic engagement. The conclusion reflects that the social capital/civil society and the financial capital/market sector analogy is justified, as social capital acts as civil society's bargaining tool.
From the Paper
"The final continuous element of social capital is social trust. As an attribute of social capital trust encourages society to overcome quiescence and to take part in political activism by instilling confidence. Underpinning this confidence is a sense of mutual supportiveness of each other and for the cause, that has united them. Interwoven with social trust is the notion of reciprocity, or the implicit assumption that those participating will get something in return for supporting any form of civil action (Onyx, 2000:60-1). This assumption also motivates social movements, the link between social capital, civil society and bargaining becomes apparent. Davis argues that the public has a distinct lack of trust in government and its processes, he goes on to say that those possessing social capital are better equipped to initiate civic engagement (2001:2-4). Which brings us to one of the most common mechanisms for collective action, that of social movements."
| |
|
Venture Capital (VC), 2004.
This paper discusses venture capital (VC), a form of equity finance, which developed in the post World War II years.
6,470 words (approx. 25.9 pages), 17 sources, MLA, AU$ 159.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses that professional venture capital firms are closely held corporations or private partnerships funded by public and private pension funds, endowment funds, corporations, wealthy individuals and foreign investors; they invest venture capital in both start-ups and established companies, thereby, leveling out their risks and ensuring a net positive return. The author points out an attractive feature of VC is that it provides the opportunity for investors to aim for very high returns, which no other financial instrument can provide. The paper relates that, while the debate continues as to whether VC really is the driver for industrial development, it is widely accepted that VC is a key tool in furthering three major economic objectives, namely, transfer, widen industrial base, and assistance in setting up of new businesses.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Definition of Venture Capital
Legal Status of VC Firms
Evolution of Venture Capital in the U.S.
Venture Capital Trends in the U.S.
Venture Capital in the Europe
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
China
Impact of Venture Capital Financing on Economic Performance
Successful VC Backed Companies
Conclusion
From the Paper
"As the firm expands, it may need more capital, which is provided by second round finance. When the firm reaches breakeven point or has already started making small profits, it will need funding for expansion of the business. This critical requirement in met by expansion capital, which drives the firm to maximize profits. Management buy out is the finance granted to the firm's management and investors to acquire an existing product line or business. As opposed to this is the Management buy-ins where funds are provided to managers outside the firm to buy into the firm with the support of venture capital investors. Finally, mezzanine financing is supplied to the firm to enable it to complete a trade sale or go in for public floatation of the firm's shares."
| |
|
Social Capital and Generosity, 2007.
A discussion on whether social capital in the United States makes an individual generous, according to Arthur Brook's article "Does Social Capital Make you Generous?"
728 words (approx. 2.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between social capital and generosity in America. Using Arthur Brook's article "Does Social Capital Make you Generous?," the paper defines business research and its purpose, discusses the business problems under investigation and identifies the parties involved in conducting the research. The paper also details the methods used to conduct the research project.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
"The Haves and the Have Nots"
Business Research and Purpose
Business Problems under Investigation
Parties Involved in the Research
Methods Used to Conduct Research
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Social capital is a measure of involvement in charitable and civic organizations, political involvement and racial and social trust in a community. Common forms of social capital include volunteering for political service work such as political campaigns or school board functions. Other forms of social capital include volunteering time to work with children or elderly individuals, and donating time to support causes to advance or support ones community. Social and racial trust is classified as a component of social capital as well. A community where individuals are accepting of cultural diversity and feel secure in their community is considered to have a strong level of social trust. Brooks's research sought to determine the correlation between social capital and generosity of Americans by asking, "Do all social capital types have a uniform impact on charitable behavior?" (Brooks, 2005 p.4)."
| |
|
Capital Punishment in Texas, 2005.
An analysis of capital punishment in the state of Texas and various related problems.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 2 sources, AU$ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This policy paper analyzes the capital murder statute in Texas and discusses the existence of particular problems concerning two aspects of the manner in which capital punishment is administered: the definition of capital murder and the ways in which capital murder cases are administered. With respect to the multi-part series of articles published in the Houston Chronicle regarding the use of capital punishment in Harris County, this paper briefly touches on several examples of significant problems surrounding the way capital punishment is administered there.
From the Paper
"Capital punishment is a highly contentious issue in the realm of law enforcement. In any discussion of the death penalty, the state of Texas tends to be a primary focus due to the fact that Texas carries out far more executions than any other American state. "
| |
|
Capital Structure, 2006.
An overview of different theories of capital structure.
2,698 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 6 sources, APA, AU$ 86.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of several different theories of corporate capital structure, focusing particularly on the differences between the traditionalist view of capital structure and the Modigliani-Miller view. The paper points out that there are two major differences between the traditionalist view of corporate capital structure and the Modigliani-Miller view, explaining that the first difference lay in the traditional view's contention that the value and cost of capital of a firm is interrelated to its capital structure, whereas the Modigliani-Miller view contends that they are independent of each other. The paper next explains that the second major difference is that the Modigliani-Miller view indicates a linear relationship between shareholder rate of return and firm leverage, which means that at low levels of debt the cost of equity increases faster under the Modigliani-Miller theorem than it does under the traditional View. The paper also takes a look at several other modern theories of corporate capital structure and investigates how these theories differ from the Modigliani-Miller view.
From the Paper
"Generally the capital structure of a company is much influenced by the practical influences like managerial shareholdings, corporate strategy and taxation. The investment strategy by firms necessitates managers to explore the methods of financing new investment. The managers practice three main preferences: utilization of retained earnings, borrowing through debt instruments or issue of new shares. Thus the retained earnings, debt and equity constitute the three primary ingredients of the capital structure of the firm. The first two ingredients show ownership by shareholders and the second ingredient shows ownership by means of debt holders. The financing policy, capital structure and firms ownership are inextricably linked in representing the ways the economic agents form and alter their asset acquisition behavior via firms and capital markets and impact their income levels and returns to asset holdings in the form of capital gains, dividends or direct remuneration,. (Company Financing, Capital Structure, and Ownership: A Survey and Implications for Developing Economies)"
| |
|
Capital Punishment, 2006.
An overview of the history capital punishment in the United States.
3,303 words (approx. 13.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 101.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of capital punishment in the United States. The paper explains that the practice of capital punishment in the United States had its origins in England and that the debate over the morality of capital punishment is a long standing one. The paper further explains that attitudes regarding capital punishment shifted over time as well as the reasons it was used. The paper discusses capital punishment policy during both World Wars, the Vietnam war and in present times and briefly compares President George W. Bush's policy on capital punishment to that of Thomas Jefferson.
From the Paper
"It is tempting, on assessing the media coverage in the United States today, to think that the debate about capital punishment is one of relatively recent origin. However, the debate originated about the same time the United States became a group of recognizable colonies with common, if still somewhat amorphous, codes of morality and ethics. Arguably, it originated earlier than that, in the England from which most American settlers came; the death penalty had long been written into English law although, as Levi notes (2002, p. 131), it was rarely carried out because the structure of government was such-with its dependence on the good will (or ill will) of the nobility-that there was much latitude in its application."
| |
|
Working Capital Management in Healthcare, 2005.
Examines the importance of having working capital management in the healthcare industry.
1,000 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, AU$ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
To maintain a strong financial position the company's capital structure must be well organized to reduce the overall cost of capital. It is essential that proper management of the cash flow and investments are scrutinized on a constant basis. This paper shows that without a firm hand on the money going out and the money coming in, a company could find themselves without working capital, bad dept and an excess inventory. Everything that affects working capital, such as payables, receivables, equity, loans, inventory and investments must be controlled constantly. This paper examines how capital management in healthcare requires regular maintenance to be successful.
Paper Outline:
Introduction
Capital Management
Importance in Healthcare
Cash and Investments
Managing Payables
Inventory Management
Investments
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Ratios are important to a company and must be analyzed frequently. Comparing the ratios to that of other similar companies will reveal just where the organization stands in the business. There are two basic financial decisions a company must make before starting. While looking at the assets of an organization, the company will naturally lean towards investing in the positive net present value (NPV) projects. Once this is determined then a capital structure is created to fund the project."
| |
|
Research and Evaluation for Social Capital and Generosity, 2006.
A review of the article, 'Does Social Capital Make you Generous?' by Arthur Brooks, discussing how social capital leads to charitable behavior.
767 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a synopsis of the research article, 'Does Social Capital Make you Generous' by Arthur Brooks. The paper includes the definition of the business research and its purpose, the business problem(s) under investigation and identification of the parties involved in conducting the research. The paper also details the method(s) used to conduct the research project. The article examined focuses on the high rate of charitable behavior of Americans.
Outline:
Abstract
Business Research and Purpose
Business Problems under Investigation
Parties Involved in the Research
Methods Used to Conduct Research
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Social capital is a measure of involvement in charitable and civic organizations, political involvement and racial and social trust in a community. Common forms of social capital include volunteering for political service work such as political campaigns or school board functions. Other forms of social capital include volunteering time to work with children or elderly individuals, and donating time to support causes to advance or support ones community. Social and racial trust is classified as a component of social capital as well. A community where individuals are accepting of cultural diversity and feel secure in their community is considered to have a strong level of social trust. Brooks's research sought to determine the correlation between social capital and generosity of Americans by asking, "Do all social capital types have a uniform impact on charitable behavior?" (Brooks, 2005 p.4)."
| |
|
Capital Punishment, 2007.
A review of the arguments against the use of capital punishment in the United States.
1,562 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the arguments commonly raised against capital punishment in the United States. Specifically, it looks at the fact that capital punishment disproportionately impacts minorities and also damages U.S. credibility within the wider international community. It also looks at the statistics for the benefits of capital punishment and the arguments against their validity. The paper concludes that capital punishment is a legal anachronism that might be giving the state extraordinary power over its citizens without actually making America's streets safer.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
The Case against Capital Punishment
From the Paper
"In the end, there are compelling reasons for abolishing the death penalty. Chiefly, the practice disproportionately impacts minorities and it damages the U.S. reputation abroad. At the same time, the death penalty is an authoritarian practice that permits the state to play "God" with its citizens - or someone else's citizens - and this is not a practice that anyone concerned with individual rights can accept lightly. Similarly, the application of the death penalty runs counter to the Christian ethos upon which America was founded and the statistics unveiled by a number of scholars claiming to prove that the death penalty is an effective deterrent are uncertain and have been strenuously challenged. In the final analysis, there are simply too many questions swirling around the use of the death penalty for Americans to tolerate its use indefinitely."
| |
|
Optimal Capital Structure, 2002.
This research examines the theory of optimal capital structure, explaining it as the composition of the liabilities and stockholders' equity side of a firm's balance sheet.
2,103 words (approx. 8.4 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
An examination of the theory of optimal capital structure. Emphasis is placed on the conflict between the traditional approach to the assessment of the role of capital structure and that of the MM theory holding that capital structure is irrelevant in a perfect capital market. The literature indicates that the jury is still out on the question of the relevance of capital structure to stockholders' value.
From the Paper
"Some theorists contend that a firm's optimal capital structure is that combination of debt and equity at which agency costs are minimized. Agency costs are the incremental costs associated with having an agent make decisions for a principal. Within the context of this consideration of the determination of optimal capital structure, management is an agent, while stockholders are the principals. Other theorists point out, however, that, while issuing debt typically produces positive outcomes for firms, the determination of an optimal capital structure for a firm is a dynamic process that, in addition to agency costs, must account for the effects of both corporate and personal income taxes, potential bankruptcy costs, transaction costs, and the degree of control over a firm's investments that will be delegated by stockholders to the firm's management (Brealey & Myers, 1996)."
| |
|
Capital Punishment, 2007.
A discussion on the advantages of capital punishment.
1,235 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce, discuss, and analyze the topic of capital punishment. Specifically, it discuss both sides of the capital punishment debate and argues why capital punishment is an excellent deterrent to crime. It looks at how the benefits of capital punishment far outweigh the drawbacks and how statistics indicate that the American public supports the death penalty for a majority of violent crimes. Thus, capital punishment is effective, saves tax dollars, and helps contain the most violent of America's criminal population.
From the Paper
"Capital punishment has been controversial throughout America history. Also referred to as the death penalty, the practice has always been a contentious and emotional issue. In the United States, disagreement over capital punishment began as early as Colonial times after America gained independence from Great Britain. Some people began to wonder if taking a human life was really justified, even by the government (Vila and Morris xxv), and the debate has raged on ever since. In fact, since the Supreme Court reinstituted the practice in 1976, the debate about capital punishment has become even more heated."
|
| Essay # 58214 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Capital Punishment, 2002.
This paper discusses the topic of capital punishment, focusing on the Washington D.C. Sniper case.
1,265 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 8 sources, MLA, AU$ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper begins by presenting some background and statistics about capital punishment in the USA. The viewpoints of both the proponents and the opponents of capital punishment are listed and problems with the use of capital punishment (such as pardoning leading to further crime, and innocent people being executed) are discussed. The paper explores public support of the death penalty and then turns to discuss the recent Washington DC sniper case and the possibility of capital punishment for the offenders. The controversiality of choice of location for the trial is looked at and the new anti-terrorism law is brought up. The paper concludes with some summation comments on capital punishment.
From the Paper
"Between 1977 and 2000, 683 inmates have been put to death under the death penalty laws of their state. 519 were by lethal injection, 149 were by electrocution, 11 were by lethal gas, 2 were by firing squad, and 3 were by hanging (Editors 347).
Capital punishment has always been a controversial and emotional issue. In the United States, controversy over capital punishment began as early as Colonial times after American gained her independence from Great Britain. Some people began to wonder if anyone really had the right to take a human life, even the government (Vila and Morris xxv), and the debate has raged on ever since."
|
|
|
