| Papers [1-16] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 7] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 —> | Search results on "ARISTOTLE RHETORIC": |
|
|
Aristotle on "Rhetoric", 2006.
An review of Aristotle's theory of rhetoric as found in his work entitled, "Rhetoric".
3,130 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, AU$ 146.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Aristotle's theory on rhetoric. The paper discusses Aristotle's philosophy as found in his work "Rhetoric" and defines what he means by the term rhetoric. The paper also shows how Aristotle's work is closely based on the Greek philosopher, Pericles' work "Funeral Oration." The paper then goes on to discusses the philosophies on rhetoric of Plato and Isocrates.
From the Paper
"What does it mean to be human? By comparison through contrast to non-humans, humans are "decision-making creatures capable of overruling [their] own instincts." It naturally follows that those tools which enable humans to exhibit these unique characteristics are the most essential to human existence and evolution. For thousands of years, Rhetoric has proved to be this ubiquitous tool. Rhetoric is a device by which humans can explore and explain the otherwise unexplainable, persuade others of the subsequently derived probabilities, and fulfill these tasks all the while integrating emotion and psychology into the process. No other art, science, or communicative tool can match the intellectual potential inherent in rhetoric. Aristotle's work Rhetoric, titled after the exclusive nature of its content, explicates the enigmatic definition of rhetoric in the first book of the three-part series, and suggests ways to employ rhetoric for any conceivable end in the second and third parts. In his opening chapter, Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to "see the persuasive and the apparently persuasive" in any case. Proceeding from this definition, Aristotle explains the means of persuasion, the importance of projected character in persuasion, and the importance of understanding and incorporating the desired end in any case involving persuasion. While the Greek philosopher, Pericles, lived nearly a century before Aristotle published Rhetoric, one the elder's works, "Funeral Oration" functions almost flawlessly as a model for Aristotle's theory of rhetoric. Aristotle's emphasis on pathos and ethos as highly useful means of persuasion as well as his prescription for effective epideictic rhetoric seem to be written following the precise form of "Funeral Oration." Whether one influenced another is irrelevant; the greater significance lies in the irrefutable, tremendous impact each work imparted on the future of rhetoric."
| |
|
Aristotle and Plato on Rhetoric, 2005.
A comparison between Plato and Aristotle's views on rhetoric.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 4 sources, AU$ 99.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at two of the classical experts on rhetoric, two philosophers, two ancient thinkers from Greece - Plato and Aristotle - who while they were close had differing opinions and beliefs regarding this art and way of thinking and arguing. The following essay looks at Plato's Gorgias and Phaedrus in order to study just what this man's thoughts on rhetoric were. Then the focus shifts to Aristotle, whose Rhetoric and Poetics will reveal this philosopher's wisdom on the subject.
From the Paper
"Aristotle and Plato on Rhetoric "Rhetoric" is a term thrown around too often today, with the user most likely having no clue of its meaning or rich background. From "rhetorical" questions to claims of politicians merely using "rhetoric," too many times the term and overall idea is exercised without a complete understanding of exactly what "rhetoric" is."
| |
|
Aristotle's "Rhetoric", 1999.
Reviews Aristotle's "RHETORIC", his description of the observed rules of persuasive speech. Focuses on his discovery of three types of speech: the political, the ceremonial & the legal.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 0 sources, AU$ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Rhetoric of Aristotle has been highly influential through the ages. It is predominantly a manual to a practical art, but it also has an interesting philosophical orientation. Aristotle affirmed that rhetoric is a subject to be studied systematically and not a random collection of common sense rules. It is an art of general scope that is applicable to all fields of human concern. Aristotle offered a systematic rhetoric and defined rhetoric as the art of discovering the means of persuasion available for any subject. The rhetor must investigate systematically both the situation with which he is presented and his own inner resources for dealing with it. Aristotle's approach to rhetoric can be seen operating in the media today.
Speech itself comes in different types according to its purpose.."
| |
|
Aristotle's "Rhetoric and Poetics", 1990.
This paper examines the issue of probability in Aristotle's "Rhetoric and Poetics" especially the relevance to contemporary culture.
3,600 words (approx. 14.4 pages), 7 sources, AU$ 204.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The purpose of this research is to examine the issue of probability in Aristotle's Rhetoric and Poetics, with a view toward showing how or to what extent Aristotle's analysis has relevance to the contemporary culture. The plan of the research will be to set forth the fundamental concepts informing Aristotle's discussion of these disciplines, and then to discuss the consistency with which he develops his analysis of their principal attributes.
At the outset, it is important to note that Aristotle makes certain assumptions about the character of the universe. In particular, he assumes that man is a social being, that civilized man lives in a political community, and that he addresses remarks to members of an ordinary, rational, common-sense civilized society. The audience for the Rhetoric and the Poetics is ... "
| |
|
Aristotle's "Rhetoric", 1991.
This paper discusses Aristotle's "Rhetoric", considered to be the definitive work on rhetoric: Divided into three books: l) the speaker, 2) the audience, & 3) the speech itself.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Aristotle's "Rhetoric" is considered the definitive work on the topic of rhetoric. Rhetoric may be defined as the effective use of either oral or written language. Aristotle specifically felt that rhetoric involves "the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion". Aristotle considered rhetoric to be unique among the arts in that it does not "instruct or persuade about its own particular subject-matter". Rather, rhetoric seeks to "direct and organize thought concerning any subject-matter". Aristotle's Rhetoric is divided into three books which correspond roughly to the three basic divisions found in classical speech. Thus, Book I is concerned with the speaker; Book II is concerned with the audience; and Book III is concerned with the speech itself.
Aristotle was not the first philosopher to write on the ... "
| |
|
Aristotle?s Rhetoric, 2002.
A discussion of the Rhetoric?s by Aristotle, explaining the concept and a few similarities with the works of Plato?s Phaedrus.
1,060 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 60.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Aristotle's definition of rhetoric as a neutral tool which can be used for either good or bad purposes by both the virtuous as well as the depraved individuals. The paper describes the use of rhetoric in public addresses and outlines Plato's input on the receptiveness of audiences.
From the Paper
"Aristotle thus terms rhetoric as a neutral tool, which can be used for either of the good or bad purposes by both the virtuous as well as the depraved individuals. Accepting his art of rhetoric's ability to be misused, he even proposes certain factors that can be used to overturn the misuse of rhetoric?s, for example rhetoric is true for all goods, except for virtue, that it is better used in convincing the just and the good as compared to the unjust and wrong arguments, and that the benefits of rhetoric?s outweigh its misuse."
| |
|
Aristotle?s Rhetorical Theory, 2005.
This paper discusses Aristotle's rhetorical theory and its influence on modern democracy.
4,080 words (approx. 16.3 pages), 10 sources, APA, AU$ 175.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Aristotle was not the first philosopher to argue from a rational, humanistic perspective nor to suggest that debates and arguments should be performed as an art form known as rhetoric; however, he is the most influential. The author points out that in his "Rhetoric", which is substantially shorter and relatively more straight-forward than most of his work, Aristotle presents a theory of rhetoric as an art that focuses on the capacity to persuade, the usefulness of rhetoric, the necessary elements of persuasion including appeals to emotion, status and logic and presents a wide range of specific stratagem for convincing an audience of one's point. The paper relates that the foundation of the modern approach to society, including the entirety of the modern political system, is fallout from the medieval rediscovery of Aristotle's work; during the Crusades, Europeans re-discovered Latin translations of Aristotle in various libraries throughout the Islamic world.
Table of Contents
Aristotle's Personal Work on "Rhetoric"
Aristotle's Historical Effect on "Rhetoric" and its Continued Fallout
Aristotle's Effects on Modern Democracy and the Sensitivity of Pathos
Does Aristotle Inadvertently Justify the Chicaneries of Modern Lawyers?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"At the foundation of American democracy, the nation had a relatively homogenous culture. (Assuming, of course, that one follows in the founder's footsteps and ignores the presence of slaves and natives) Athens, also, was a homogenous culture, where the members had most interests in common. So Aristotle's ideas on comprehending the common beliefs on one's audience and building on them based on syllogism and appeals to the common good were quite efficient. However, as the nation aged it has become increasingly multi-cultural, with a wider variety of base worldviews interacting to create the polis. A similar progression has taken place through-out the European democracies, and of course many post-colonial colonies have had to deal with such disparities from the beginning. Hence, it may seem that Aristotle's vision of rhetoric may have difficulties in a modern setting."
| |
|
Rhetoric and Aristotle, 2006.
An analysis of Aristotle's ideas about rhetoric, how it functions and its role in today's society.
1,300 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, AU$ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes Aristotle's ideas about rhetoric. It contrasts Aristotle's perspectives to other theorists and then compares the role of rhetoric and oratory in ancient times to today. Finally, the paper explores the usefulness of rhetoric in our lives today.
Outline
Aristotle's Rhetoric and Other Interpretations
Functions of Rhetoric and Oratory Then and Now
The Usefulness of Rhetoric in Our Roles in Life
From the Paper
"Rhetoric as defined by Aristotle and others holding fast to his rules is the counterpart of Dialectic. Both alike are concerned with such things as come, more or less, within the general ken of all men and belong to no definite science. Accordingly all men make use, more or less, of both; for to a certain extent all men attempt to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves and to attack others. Ordinary people do this either at random or through practice or from acquired habit. Both ways being possible, the subject can plainly be handled systematically, for it is possible to inquire the reason why some speakers succeed through practice and others spontaneously; and every one will at once agree that such an inquiry is the function of an art."
| |
|
Aristotle & Kenneth Burke on Rhetoric, 1999.
Compares philosophers' views, focusing on Aristotle's idealistic & Burke's more realistic arguments on art of rhetoric.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, AU$ 76.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" This study will compare and contrast the ideas of Aristotle and Kenneth Burke on rhetoric. The study will argue that Aristotle is determined arrive at a rhetoric which is based on reason and which yields an ideal portrait of the art, whereas Burke, while he deeply appreciates Aristotle, does not believe that such an ideal can be found, although he has not given up the search.
To Aristotle, language and the use of language in effective speech can bring human beings nearer and nearer their higher purpose, which is happiness as that ideal, but for Burke words and their use are much more problematic. Words for Burke are much more mysterious and playful entities than for Aristotle. For Aristotle, the broad class of the audience is what is foremost, while with Burke the reader suspects that Burke is enjoying.."
| |
|
Rhetoric: Non Est Ars Quae Ad Effectum Casu Venit, 2001.
A character analysis of Creon in the play "Oedipus" the king and a comparison of Aristotles "Rhetoric" and Creon's persuasive speech to Oedipus.
1,053 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 4 sources, AU$ 58.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers a character analysis of Creon in the play Oedipus the King, with an emphasis on human nature. One aspect of human nature that is explored is what Aristotle referred to as the art of rhetoric. The paper's main focus is Creon?s use of the art of persuasion. The paper uses Aristotle?s "Rhetoric" as the basis for the analysis, and as a secondary source.
From the Paper
?Sometimes persuasion is only glorified manipulation, and other times persuasion is truly the heartfelt sentiment of the speaker. Either way, in the eyes of the Greek philosophers persuasion is form of art. While Creon defends himself from the accusations of Oedipus he taints his words with succulent messages of pathos, logos and ethos... When comparing Creon?s speech to Aristotle?s guidelines for successful rhetoric we can see that Creon speaks in a manor that renders him ?worthy of confidence? (17)."
| |
|
George W. Bush and Aristotle, 2004.
An analysis of a speech by President George W. Bush using Aristotle's theory of rhetoric.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 3 sources, MLA, AU$ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes a 2002 speech by President George W. Bush using Aristotle's theory of rhetoric. It looks at Bush's appeal to ethos, pathos and logos. It also examines his use of rhetorical devices for persuading his audience that the war on terror is more than a government policy.
From the Paper
"President George W Bush delivered an address on the South Lawn of the White House. The date was the six-month anniversary of the September terrorist attack on the United States. In the speech Bush appealed .."
| |
|
Rhetoric, 2008.
This paper provides a review of the concept of rhetoric.
2,383 words (approx. 9.5 pages), 6 sources, APA, AU$ 118.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that rhetoric has come to mean the spoken word, in particular those words spoken by politicians. The writer then discusses that a review of the history of rhetoric reveals that rhetoric is quite different from popular definitions. This paper reviews and critiques what classical scholars and philosophers like Cicero, Plato and Aristotle believed about rhetoric. Their view that rhetoric, ethics and philosophy are interrelated is also presented in this paper, along with the New Rhetoric and instructions on how to properly engage in formal communication, which is also an important aspect of rhetoric.
Outline:
Abstract
Introduction
From the Paper
"The bigger picture of rhetoric is nothing like the political polemics that play out during campaigns for president. Rhetoric is speaking and writing, hopefully intelligent dialogue or speech making and worthy written narrative. Rhetoric is also a way of healing what hurts inside the heart and the spirit.
"To wit, Payne's points are appropriate because everyone on the planet, no matter what language they speak, no matter the culture or continent, can understand failure. What many individuals do not understand, however, is how to use rhetoric effectively to dig out of the hole created by the failure."
| |
|
Aristotle, 2005.
This paper discusses the persons who influenced Aristotle and Aristotle's influence on many fields including the physical and biological sciences, politics, psychology, poetry and logic.
1,170 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 6 sources, MLA, AU$ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Thales (c. 640-546 BC) of Miletus, who is considered to have been the founder of natural philosophy, and Empedocles' system of four elements, earth, water, air and fire were major influences on Aristotle. The author stresses that Aristotle's influence was not isolated to Western civilization but was translated first into Syriac and later into Arabic, beginning in 450 A.D.; the Arabs were primarily interested in the medical, astronomical and mathematical aspects of the Aristotelian tradition. The paper relates that one of Aristotle's contributions, which is still in existence today, is the university where Aristotle lectured at regularly scheduled hours as opposed to the debate of his predecessors.
From the Paper
"Biological principles were highly influenced by Aristotle. William Harvey, the founder of modern physiology was very much influenced by Aristotle and "...founded much of his work on the Aristotelian assumption that the shape, structure and size of each organ of the animal body indicated its purpose and function in the whole system." The idea of spontaneous generation was a commonly held belief, with it roots dating back to Aristotle and was not disproved until experiments were performed by Louis Pasteur."
| |
|
Aristotle on Pleasure, 2008.
An analysis of Aristotle's views on pleasure, specifically in his work, "The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle."
1,197 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, AU$ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the views of Aristotle on the experience of pleasure in the world. The paper specifically focuses on "The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle" by Aristotle and discusses his views expressed in the work. The paper explains how pleasure for Aristotle is an aspect of human existence that guides action and can guide virtuous living.
From the Paper
"Moderation seems to be the stand of Aristotle on pleasure, somewhere in between the contrary idea of all pleasure being a bad thing for man and all pleasure being a good thing for man Aristotle hangs his idea of pleasure and pleasure seeking as a natural state of man seeking eudaimonia. If a man seeks pleasure that is derived form his own desire in a natural state he is seeking pleasure that is necessary for the completion of a virtuous life. If a man seeks pleasure from an unnatural state, such as in the state of illness he is seeking pleasure for un-virtuous reasons and therefore such acts and emotions cannot be considered pleasure."
| |
|
Plato: Rhetoric Critique, 2003.
An examination of Plato's critique of rhetoric.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Plato's critique of rhetoric as witnessed in the Socratic dialogue known as the Gorgias that argues rhetoric is not an effective method of communication particularly when compared to the dialectic. It also compares Plato's views of civic rhetoric with those of Aristotle.
From the Paper
"Even though Aristotle agreed with Plato on a number of ideas, they disagreed on a variety of significant philosophical and practical concepts. One of these was the best form for civic rhetoric. Plato argues in the Gorgias ..."
| |
|
Aristotle on Economic Exchange and Slavery, 2001.
An analysis of the works of the philosopher Aristotle and the economist Karl Polanyi, evaluating Aristotle's arguments on slavery and economic exchange.
1,095 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, AU$ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Aristotle?s arguments on slavery and economic exchange. The paper outlines how Aristotle validates the concept of slavery under one principle of economic exchange. The paper also provides that when measured against economist Karl Polanyi?s definitions of the market principle, Aristotle?s views on slavery fall into his own definition of the ?unnatural? category of economic exchange.
From the Paper
"Economist Karl Polanyi and the philosopher Aristotle have differing views on economic exchange. According to Polanyi, the three principles of exchange are market principle, redistribution, and reciprocity. The market principle describes the buying and selling of goods and services based on the laws of supply and demand, and often involves bargaining. Redistribution is the moving of products from the local level to a hierarchical center, reorganization of those products, and sending them back down to the local level. Redistribution is a form of exchange that works with the market system."
|
|
|
