Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

The Presumption of Registrability


# 109162
The Presumption of Registrability
An analysis of the effect of the presumption of registrability introduced by s. 33 of the Australian Trade Marks Act 1995.
2,690 words (approx. 10.8 pages) | 6 sources | MLA | 2005 Australia


Paper Summary:

This paper explains that one of the main changes introduced by the new Trade Marks Act is the "presumption of registrability" prescribed by s 33, which prescribes that an application for registration must be accepted unless the Registrar is satisfied that there are grounds for rejecting it. Thereby, the onus is no longer on the applicant to establish registrability but instead is shifted to the Registrar. The author reviews various cases and discovers an inconsistency in the court's interpretation and application of s 33 insofar as examination practice is concerned. The paper concludes that case law appears to be slightly more inclined to an interpretation that a trade mark will be registered unless there is some specific objection to it.

Table of Contents:
Historical Framework
Examination Today
Section 41
Interpretations by the Courts
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"In 'Kenman Kandy v Registrar of Trade Marks' (2002) 56 IPR 30, the millennium bug shape was rejected for being not inherently adapted to distinguish. On appeal to the federal court, however, it was explicitly stated that the impact upon the access of other traders to the use of insect like shapes as trade marks is speculative. That is, the likelihood that other traders in the course of their businesses, and without improper motives, would desire to use a shape such as the millennium bug, and in other words, the bug's inherent adaptability to distinguish, is speculative."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Working Party To Review The Trade Marks Legislation Recommended Changes to the Australian Trade Marks Legislation: A report to the Hon. Ross Free MP Minister for Science and Technology July 1992
  • Second Reading Speech, House of Representatives Debates, 27 September 1995, pp1909-11
  • Lahore J., Patents, Trade Marks & Related Rights 1996
  • Re Application by Henry Quennell Ltd (1955) 72 RPC 36 (Pussikin)
  • French J, Kenman Kandy Australia Pty Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (2002) 56 IPR 30 at 37

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

The Presumption of Registrability (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 14, 2012, from http://www.academon.com.au/Analytical-Essay-The-Presumption-of-Registrability/109162

MLA Citation:

"The Presumption of Registrability" 15 January 2012. Web. 14 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.com.au/Analytical-Essay-The-Presumption-of-Registrability/109162>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: AU$ 45.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

Vaeth AU
Publisher Since:
Nov 19, 2008
The author is a registered patent and trade marks attorney who holds a masters degree in industrial property, and bachelors degrees in both engineering and computer science. The author is still practising as an attorney, and has to-date more than 8 years experience in the field of intellectual property.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success